State Regulations of Homeowners Associations’ Abilities to Restrict Solar Panels

Twenty-nine states have adopted law that restricts the ability of a homeowners association (HOA) to restrict or prohibit the installation of devices onto an HOA member’s home that capture and transform sunlight into electricity. Such devices are commonly referred to as solar panels, solar energy systems, solar collectors, and other similar terms, though the exact definitions vary by state. Of these states, 22 allow HOAs to implement only reasonable restrictions, while the remaining 7 also allow other types of restrictions. Including Kansas, 21 states do not have law addressing this topic.
For purposes of this article, the term “solar panel” will be used generally to encompass the array of devices mentioned previously.

Reasonable Restrictions

Of the states that allow for only “reasonable restrictions” on solar panels, the definition of what is a “reasonable restriction” is not uniform. However, these definitions generally include one or more of the following:

  • Do not significantly increase the cost of installation, maintenance, and removal of the system;
  • Do not significantly decrease the efficiency or specified performance of the system; and
  • Allow for an alternative system of comparable cost, efficiency, and energy conservation benefits.

Other Restrictions

New Mexico and Vermont impose reasonable restrictions, except that New Mexico’s are based on an Attorney General opinion rather than statute, and Vermont’s provisions apply to any entity granted the power or right to enforce restrictions, not just an HOA.

Montana prohibits HOAs from imposing more stringent restrictions than what were in place at the time the member acquired the property without the express consent of the member. Similarly, West Virginia law states that HOA policies prohibiting or restricting solar panels are void and unenforceable unless voted on and approved by the HOA’s members.

Iowa law allows for cities and counties to preclude new subdivisions from adding covenants that unreasonably restrict the use of solar panels.

Ohio law allows for owners of certain condominium units to install solar panels in certain circumstance:

  • If the unit owner is responsible for the unit’s roof; or
  • The HOA declaration assigns responsibility for and allows for solar panels.

Wyoming’s Solar Rights Act declares the beneficial use of solar energy to be a property right, and therefore is only to be regulated by local government within specific bounds, such as by establishing a permit system.

Legislation on HOA Solar Panel Restrictions by State chart map of the U.S.A.
Legislation on HOA Solar Panel Restrictions by State

For more information, contact:

Jillian Block
Research Analyst

Matthew Willis
Senior Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
(785) 296-3181
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov

State Water Plan Fund, Kansas Water Authority, and the State Water Plan

State Water Plan Fund

The State Water Plan Fund (SWPF) is a statutory fund (KSA 2023 Supp. 82a-951) created by the 1989 Legislature for the purpose of implementing the State Water Plan (KSA 2023 Supp. 82a-903, et seq.). The SWPF is subject to appropriation acts by the Legislature and may be used for the establishment and implementation of water-related projects or programs and related technical assistance. Funding from the SWPF may not be used to replace full-time equivalent (FTE) positions or for recreational projects that do not meet the goals or objectives of the State Water Plan.

Revenue

Revenue for the SWPF is generated from the following sources:

  • Water Protection Fees: A water protection fee of $0.03 per 1,000 gallons of water is assessed on the following:
    • Water sold at retail by public water supply systems;
    • Water designated for industrial use; and
    • Water designated for watering livestock;
  • Fertilizer and Pesticide Fees: A tonnage fee on fertilizer and a fee for the registration of pesticides is assessed and transferred to the SWPF in the following amounts:
    • Inspection fees are imposed on each ton of fertilizer sold, offered, or exposed for sale or distributed in Kansas. Of that fee, $1.40 per ton is credited to the SWPF; and
    • Every agricultural chemical distributed, sold, or offered for sale within the state must be registered, with an annual fee assessed for each registration. From each registration fee, $100 is credited to the SWPF;
  • Sand Royalty Receipts: A fee of $0.15 per ton of sand sold is deposited in the SWPF;
  • Pollution Fines: Certain fines and penalties are levied by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) for water-related pollution and are credited to the SWPF, including:
    • Violation of permit terms or conditions relating to public water supply systems or wastewater treatment systems; and
    • Violations of law governing the disposal of solid and hazardous waste;
  • Clean Drinking Water Fees: A clean drinking water fee of $0.03 per 1,000 gallons of water is assessed on retail water sold by a public water supply system and delivered through mains, lines, or pipes. Since July 1, 2007, revenue from the clean drinking water fee has been distributed as follows:
    • 5/106 to the State Highway Fund;
    • Of the remaining 101/106, no less than 15.0 percent shall be utilized to provide on-site technical assistance for public water supply systems; and
    • The remainder to renovate and protect lakes used for public water supply;
  • State General Fund Transfer: By statute, $6.0 million is required to be transferred annually from the State General Fund (SGF) to the SWPF; however, the Legislature may decrease the amount of the transfer through an appropriations bill. The 2023 Legislature approved the full statutory transfer from the SGF to the SWPF in FY 2023 and FY 2024; and
  • Economic Development Initiatives Fund Transfer: By statute, $2.0 million is required to be transferred annually from the Economic Development Initiatives Fund (EDIF) to the SWPF; however, the Legislature may decrease the amount of the transfer through the appropriations bill. The 2023 Legislature approved the full statutory transfer from the EDIF to the SWPF in FY 2023 and FY 2024.

2023 Senate Sub. for HB 2302

The 2023 Legislature passed and the Governor signed Senate Sub. for HB 2302, which authorizes a transfer of $35.0 million SGF to the SWPF in FY 2024 and recommends the same transfer be made every successive year through FY 2027. This amount is in addition to the $6.0 million SGF transfer already authorized in statute, resulting in authorized transfers from the SGF to the SWPF totaling $41.0 million in FY 2024. The bill also transfers $5.0 million SWPF to a newly-created Water Technical Assistance Fund in FY 2024 and $12.0 million SWPF to a newly- created Water Projects Grant Fund in FY 2024. If the Legislature approves the appropriation of $35.0 million SGF to the SWPF in future years, the $5.0 million SWPF transfer to the Water Technical Assistance Fund and $12.0 million SWPF transfer to the Water Projects Grant Fund would occur. Both funds are administered by the Kansas Water Office (KWO).

State Water Plan Fund Receipts and Transfers*

Receipts and Transfers InFY 2022 ActualFY 2023 ApprovedFY 2024 Approved
State General Fund$4,005,632$ 6,000,000$ 41,000,000
Economic Development Initiatives Fund         1,719,264                2,000,000                2,000,000
Municipal Water Fees         3,098,059                3,167,209                3,189,304
Industrial Water Fees            720,340                   850,000                   850,000
Stock Water Fees            557,940                   375,000                   439,609
Pesticide Registration Fees         1,524,100                1,365,000                1,488,892
Fertilizer Registration Fees         4,370,338                3,829,194                4,049,921
Pollution Fines and Penalties              60,841                   200,000                     70,000
Sand Royalty Receipts              13,430                     25,000                     15,000
Clean Drinking Water Fees         2,830,759                2,738,890                2,872,301
Total Receipts/Transfers In $18,900,703$ 20,550,293$55,975,027

Expenditures

Expenditures from the SWPF are based on priorities of the State Water Plan. The State Water Plan is developed and approved by the Kansas Water Authority. The following table summarizes recent actual and approved expenditures from the SWPF.

State Water Plan Fund Expenditures

Agency/ProjectFY 2022 ActualFY 2023 ApprovedFY 2024 Approved
Department of Agriculture


Interstate Water Issues            445,668                   791,882                   514,664
Water Use Study              27,387                   216,144                   100,000
Basin Management             460,322                1,169,439                   650,174
Water Resources Cost Share         1,149,752                4,023,581                2,834,714
Nonpoint Source Pollution Assistance         1,550,065                2,291,809                1,863,636
Aid to Conservation Districts         2,223,373                2,473,373                2,502,706
Water Transition Assistance/CREP            339,680                   979,867                   550,727
Watershed Dam Construction            688,285                   550,000                   650,000
Water Quality Buffer Initiative                1,167                   635,432                            –  
Riparian & Wetland Program              43,670                   666,194                   154,024
Streambank Stabilization                      –                              –                              –  
Irrigation Technology            266,070                   408,976                   550,000
Lake Restoration            583,697                1,084,589                   750,000
Crop and Livestock Water Research            250,000                   250,000                   350,000
Soil Health Initiative                      –                     100,000                   400,000
Subtotal – Department of Agriculture        8,029,136             15,641,286             11,870,645
Kansas Water Office


Assessment and Evaluation            536,457                1,156,180                   834,078
MOU – Storage Operation and Maintenance            532,589                   530,464                   736,160
Technical Assistance to Water Users            298,682                   367,709                   425,000
Streamgaging            413,580                   423,130                   448,708
Reservoir Surveys and Research            252,553                   583,724                   450,000
Watershed Conservation Practices Implementation            359,422                1,190,578                1,000,000
Milford Lake RCPP              24,878                   605,122                   884,176
Water Vision Education                1,865                   472,910                   250,000
Water Technology Farms              48,598                   326,402                   850,000
Equus Beds Chloride Plume                      –                       50,000                     50,000
Arbuckle Study                      –                     210,000                   150,000
Water Injection Dredging                      –                  2,000,000                            –  
Flood Response Study                      –                     200,000                   200,000
HB 2302 Projects                      –                              –                18,000,000
Subtotal – Kansas Water Office        2,468,624               8,116,219             24,278,122
KDHE-Environment


Contamination Remediation         1,020,958                1,163,792                1,095,978
Local Environment Protection Program                      –                              –                     250,000
Total Maximum Daily Load            270,426                   459,722                   384,916
Nonpoint Source Program            224,334                   506,806                   414,893
Harmful Algae Bloom Pilot            656,182                   766,429                   150,547
Watershed Restoration and Protection (WRAPS)            590,000                1,140,884                1,000,000
Stream Trash Removal                      –                              –                       50,000
Drinking Water Protection Program            286,230                   863,770                   800,000
Subtotal – KDHE-Environment        3,048,130               4,901,403               4,146,334
Department of Wildlife and Parks


Aquatic Nuisance Species                      –                     224,457                   224,457
University of Kansas


Geological Survey              26,841                     26,841                     26,841
Governor’s COLA                      –                              –                       75,459
GRAND TOTAL EXPENDITURES      13,572,731             28,910,206             40,621,858

Kansas Water Authority

The Kansas Water Authority is a 24-member board that provides water policy advice to the Governor, the Legislature, and the Director of the KWO. The Authority is responsible for approving water storage sales; developing the State Water Plan; and approving federal water contracts, proposing rules and regulations, and legislation by the KWO. The Authority meets quarterly and consists of 13 voting members and 11 ex officio members.

The voting membership of the Authority includes:

  • One member appointed by the Governor (serving as chairperson);
  • One member appointed by the President of the Senate;
  • One member appointed by the Speaker of the House;
  • A representative of large municipal water users;
  • A representative of small municipal water users;
  • A board member of a western Kansas Groundwater Management District (including Districts 1, 3, and 4);
  • A board member of a central Kansas Groundwater Management District (including Districts 2 and 5);
  • A member of the Kansas Association of Conservation Districts;
  • A representative of industrial water users;
  • A member of the State Association of Watershed Districts;
  • A member with a demonstrated background and interest in water use, conservation, and environmental issues; and
  • Two representatives of the general public.

The ex officio membership of the Authority includes:

  • The State Geologist;
  • The Chief Engineer of the Division of Water Resources of the Kansas Department of Agriculture (KDA);
  • The Director of the Division of Environment of the Department of Health and Environment;
  • The Director of the KWO (also serving as secretary of the Authority);
  • The Director of the Agricultural Experiment Station of Kansas State University;
  • The Chairperson of the Kansas Corporation Commission;
  • The Secretary of Wildlife and Parks;
  • The Secretary of Commerce;
  • The Executive Director of the KDA Division of Conservation;
  • The Secretary of Agriculture; and
  • The State Biologist.

A primary responsibility of the Authority is to consider and approve policy for inclusion in the State Water Plan. The State Water Plan includes policy recommendations that have specific statewide or local impact and priority issues and recommendations for each of the 12 river basins in Kansas.

Budgetary Process

Historically, the Division of the Budget has assigned allocations to each agency for the expenditure of SWPF moneys. Beginning with the FY 2008 budget cycle, the Authority and the Division of the Budget agreed to allow the Authority to develop a budget recommendation in lieu of the Division’s allocation process.

A budget subcommittee of the Authority meets in summer to develop a SWPF budget proposal. The budget is presented to the full Authority at its August meeting. The Authority-approved budget is used by the state agencies to develop their budgets.

The Governor’s budget includes recommended expenditures for the SWPF when it is presented to the Legislature each January.

by Luke Drury
Senior Fiscal Analyst
785-296-7250

Briefing Book 2024

This publication contains briefs on timely topics that may be relevant during the current Legislative Session. Previous Briefing Book articles and more in-depth resources and memoranda continue to be updated with the latest information and are available here on the Kansas Legislative Research Department website.

For this and future editions, the Briefing Book’s design is intended to provide a more concise and useful resource for legislators. Articles have a standard length of two pages to efficiently convey the most important points about each topic, and more graphics are included to illustrate large amounts of data in a concise format. The topics covered are also especially topical and timely in nature; previous Briefing Book articles that provided introductory overviews of broader government topics have been moved to the KLRD website.

The goal of these changes is to provide a publication that is compact, easy to read, and relevant to even the most veteran lawmakers as a new session begins in the Statehouse.

Cover: Soldiers and sailors’ reunion, at the State House, Topeka, Kansas, Sept. 15, 1881, by Anderson, N.L, 1881. Public domain image from the Library of Congress.

Download a PDF of the Briefing Book here, or read on for individual articles.

Download the 2024 Briefing Book here. (PDF, 6 mb) or read on for individual articles.

Contents

Agriculture and Natural Resources

Commerce, Labor, and Economic Development

Education

Elections and Ethics

Federal and State Affairs

Financial Institutions and Insurance

Health and Social Services

Judiciary, Corrections, and Juvenile Justice

State Budget

Taxation

Transportation

Utilities and Energy

Costs of and Laws to Reduce Distracted Driving

This memorandum provides information on restrictions on use of electronic devices while driving in the laws of all states and the District of Columbia. It also summarizes costs of distracted driving in Kansas, state laws prohibiting distracted driving in general, the specific activities or actions the state laws prohibit, exemptions to device-use bans, and applicable fines and other penalties.

Telehealth Advances and Status Update After the Public Health Emergency

With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States in early 2020, both the federal government and the State of Kansas responded by issuing orders to waive regulations pertaining to telehealth to ease the access to medical care for individuals, in light of social distancing measures to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. This memorandum provides an overview of the federal government changes to telehealth regulations, the Kansas telehealth regulations, the Kansas telehealth flexibilities initiated as they relate to the KanCare program and executive orders, and other flexibilities related to prescriptions and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) patient communications.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, “telehealth” is defined differently by nearly all states and is even defined differently by various entities within the federal government. Generally, “telemedicine” refers to clinical services, and “telehealth” encompasses a broader scope and can refer to remote non-clinical services, including provider training, administrative meetings, and continuing medical education, in addition to clinical services. Telehealth and telemedicine can often be used interchangeably.

The Kansas Legislative Research Department (KLRD) provides several memorandums concerning telehealth, including an overview on telehealth and telemedicine definitions, coverage of telehealth services in Medicaid and Medicare, and telemedicine laws and recent legislation in nearby states, which may be found on the KLRD website.

Federal Actions

CARES Act Changes to Telehealth

On March 6, 2020, Congress passed the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response (CPR) Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 [PL 116-123]. The CPR Act facilitated changes for telehealth services, providing the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) the authority to temporarily waive or modify Medicare requirements related to telehealth services during the emergency period.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, [PL 116-136] enacted on March 7, 2020, included funds for the provision of telehealth services and increased telehealth capacity through the purchase of equipment and other methods. More specifically, telehealth provisions in the CARES Act:

  • Appropriated $29 million for each of federal fiscal years 2021 through 2025 for telehealth grants, including the Telehealth Network Grant Program that awards eligible entities for projects that demonstrate telehealth technologies can be used in rural areas and medically-underserved areas;
  • Allowed under Section 3701, for plans beginning on or before December 31, 2020, high-deductible health plans with a health savings account (HSA) to cover telehealth services prior to a patient reaching the deductible;
  • Granted the Secretary the authority to waive provisions with regard to payment for telehealth services and, for telehealth services provided during the COVID-19 emergency period, removed the requirement that providers of telehealth services have treated the Medicare beneficiary receiving telehealth services in the last three years;
  • Allowed federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs) to provide telehealth services to Medicare beneficiaries during the COVID-19 emergency period;
  • Allowed Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice care to have a face-to-face encounter via telehealth with a hospice physician or nurse practitioner to recertify continued eligibility for hospice care during the COVID-19 emergency period;
  • Required the Secretary to issue clarifying guidance regarding the use of telecommunications systems for home health services, including remote patient monitoring, during the COVID-19 emergency period;
  • Allocated $200 million to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for salaries and expenses to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, domestically or internationally, specifically authorizing the use of funds to support efforts of health care providers to address the coronavirus by providing telecommunications services, information services, and devices necessary to enable the provision of telehealth services during an emergency period; and
  • Allocated $180 million to the Health Resources and Services Administration (agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHS]) to carry out telehealth and rural health activities, of which no less than $15 million was required to be allocated to tribes, tribal organizations, urban Indian health organizations, or health service providers to tribes.

Some flexibilities granted in the CARES Act continued through and after the declared COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) due to actions by the Secretary and Congress. These provisions are discussed in the following section.

Federal Regulations

In certain emergency circumstances the Secretary, using Section 1135 of the Social Security Act, may temporarily modify or waive certain Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Plan (CHIP) regulations using blanket waivers. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published guidance on these changes (effective March 1, 2020, through the end of the PHE), which can be found at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/summary-covid-19-emergency-declaration-waivers.pdf.

Medicare Telehealth Policies

The following are some of the major changes to Medicare telehealth policy made by the Secretary due to the COVID-19 PHE:

  • Allowed certain practitioners to bill for telehealth services that were not previously billable. This included physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech language pathologists, and others;
  • Allowed the use of audio-only equipment to furnish services described by the codes for audio-only telephone evaluation and management services and behavioral health counseling and educational services;
  • Waived certain regulations for critical access hospitals regarding telemedicine and made it easier for telemedicine services to be furnished to the hospital’s patients though an agreement with an off-site hospital;
  • Allowed physicians and non-physician practitioners to perform in-person visits for nursing home residents in skilled nursing facilities and visits to be conducted, as appropriate, via telehealth options;
  • Allowed physicians and other practitioners to render telehealth services from their homes without reporting their home address on their Medicare enrollment while continuing to bill from their currently enrolled location; and
  • Removed limitations on where Medicare patients are eligible for telehealth during the emergency, in particular, allowing patients outside of rural areas and patients in their homes to be eligible.

Waivers in effect and authorized under Section 1135 of the Social Security Act were in place until the end of the PHE, May 11, 2023.

Permanent changes to Medicare telehealth. The Consolidated Appropriations Acts of 2021 and 2022, passed by Congress, authorized permanent changes to Medicare telehealth policies, including:

  • FQHCs and RHCs may serve as a distant site provider for behavioral/mental telehealth services;
  • Medicare patients may receive telehealth services for behavioral/mental health care in their home;
  • No geographic restrictions for originating site for behavioral/mental telehealth services;
  • Behavioral/mental telehealth services may be delivered using audio-only communication platforms; and
  • Rural emergency hospitals (REHs) are eligible originating sites for telehealth.

Temporary changes to Medicare telehealth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 authorized the following changes to Medicare telehealth policies through December 31, 2024:

  • FQHCs and RHCs may serve as a distant site provider for non-behavioral/mental telehealth services;
  • Medicare patients may receive telehealth services in their home;
  • No geographic restrictions for originating site for non-behavioral/mental telehealth services;
  • Some non-behavioral/mental telehealth services may be delivered using audio-only communication platforms;
  • An in-person visit within six months of an initial behavioral/mental telehealth service, and annually thereafter, is not required; and
  • Telehealth services may be provided by all eligible Medicare providers.

The CY 2024 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule from CMS implements the telehealth flexibilities passed in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, through the end of 2024. The CY 2024 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule also proposes to simplify CMS’s process for considering requests to add, remove, or change services on the Medicare Telehealth Services List; change the payment methodology for Medicare mental health services provided via telehealth; and extend permitting direct supervision of practitioners via telehealth, among other policies.

Federal Telehealth Grants

With initial funding of $200 million provided through the CARES Act, the FCC administered grant funding to health care providers through the COVID-19 Telehealth Program to help provide connected care services to patients in their homes or mobile locations. Ten Kansas providers received grants in the first round of applications, totaling more than $500,000. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, provided additional funding for the program, and six Kansas providers received grants in the second round of funding, totaling more than $3 million.

Prescription Flexibilities

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Diversion Control Division issued guidance on many areas concerning controlled substances and electronic prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Controlled Substances Act contains exceptions to the general rule that a prescription for a controlled substance issued by means of the Internet (including telemedicine) must generally be predicated on an in-person medical evaluation. One of these exceptions is when the Secretary has declared a public health emergency.

As of March 16, 2020, DEA-registered practitioners in all areas of the United States are permitted to issue prescriptions for all Schedule II-V controlled substances to patients for whom they have not conducted an in-person medical evaluation, provided all of the following conditions are met:

  • The prescription is issued for a legitimate medical purpose by a practitioner acting in the usual course of their professional practice;
  • The telemedicine communication is conducted during an audio-visual, real-time, two-way interactive communication system; and
  • The practitioner is acting in accordance with applicable federal and state laws.

In October 2023, the DEA announced, jointly with HHS, an extension of the flexibility which allows prescribing practitioners to prescribe controlled medications to a patient via telehealth through December 31, 2024. The DEA is working to promulgate new standards by the fall of 2024.

In 2020, the DEA also announced that practitioners may prescribe buprenorphine1 to new and existing patients with opioid use disorder via telephone by otherwise authorized practitioners without requiring such practitioners to first conduct an examination of the patient in-person or via telemedicine. In December 2022, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, which removed the federal requirement for health care practitioners to have a waiver to prescribe buprenorphine, increasing access to treatment.

1Buprenorphine is the first medication to treat opioid use disorder that can be prescribed or dispensed in physician offices. It is a opioid partial agonist and produces effects such as euphoria or respiratory depression at low to moderate doses, with weaker effects than full opioid agonists like methadone. When taken as prescribed, buprenorphine diminishes withdrawal symptoms and physical dependency on opioids.

HIPAA Flexibilities

In January 2021, the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a Notification of Enforcement Discretion (Notification) regarding COVID-19 and telehealth communications, effective through the end of the PHE. The Notification stated HIPAA-covered health care providers could, in good faith, provide telehealth services to patients using remote communication technologies, even if the application did not fully comply with HIPAA rules. The OCR would exercise its discretion and would not impose penalties for noncompliance with the regulatory requirements under the HIPAA rules against covered health care providers in connection with the good faith provision of telehealth during the COVID-19 public health emergency.

The Notification only applied to HIPAA-covered health care providers. A health care provider is a covered entity under HIPAA if it transmits any health information in electronic form in connection with a transaction for which the Secretary has adopted a standard. The Notification applied to all HIPAA-covered health care providers, with no limitations on patients they served with telehealth, including those patients that receive Medicare or Medicaid benefits.

Under the Notification, covered health care providers were authorized to use popular applications to deliver telehealth as long as they were “non-public-facing.” Examples of public-facing applications are Facebook Live and Twitch. Examples of non-public-facing video chat applications include:

  • Apple FaceTime;
  • Facebook Messenger video chat;
  • Google Hangouts video;
  • Zoom; and
  • Skype.

When the PHE ended on May 11, 2023, providers had a 90-day transition period to bring their telehealth practices into compliance with HIPAA. Since August 10, 2023, health care providers again had to comply with Pre-Notification HIPAA rules regarding telehealth.

Kansas Telehealth Actions

KanCare

On March 20, 2020, the State Medicaid Director sent a communication to CMS detailing the Medicaid requirements that pose challenges for health care delivery in Kansas during the pandemic. On March 24, 2020, CMS sent a response of the different approvals related to the requests, pursuant to Section 1135 of the Social Security Act.

In regard to the reimbursement rates for distance sites, Kansas Medical Assistance Program (KMAP) General Bulletin 20045 stated services delivered through telemedicine would be equivalent to identical services provided in person. The Medicaid fee-for-service fee schedule posted on the KMAP website was to serve as the source for reimbursement by code. The bulletin stated there would be no change in reimbursement levels for existing originating sites. In the instance that “home” was the originating site, then there would be no originating site fee paid for that claim.

The following are some of the flexibilities that Kansans were able to utilize during the COVID-19 pandemic for telehealth services:

  • No geographic limitations for telehealth services (e.g., services are not limited to rural or non-metropolitan service locations);
  • The patient’s home was an eligible “originating site” or “patient site” for telehealth services;
  • Other non-health care facilities (e.g., schools, work sites, libraries) were eligible as originating/patient sites;
  • Originating and patient sites, other than the patient’s home, could bill for a facility fee (this also applied to FQHCs and RHCs);
  • Providers were allowed to be reimbursed for certain codes when the originating telehealth site place of service was “home” (Place of Service Code 12);
  • A prior existing relationship with a patient was not required to provide telehealth services;
  • Any eligible member service could be provided via telehealth when medically-necessary and appropriate;
  • Patient co-pays and out-of-pocket costs still applied unless waived by the payor or plan (not applicable for COVID-19 services);
  • Prior authorization was not required for telehealth services, unless in-person services also require prior authorization;
  • For some services, providers could utilize telephone/audio-only visits;
  • Verbal consent, and not requiring written consent of the patient for some services, was allowed; and
  • Personal devices such as smartphones and tablets could be used to deliver telehealth services (Kansas allowed for some, but required HIPAA compliance).

These flexibilities ended with the PHE on May 11, 2023.

KanCare currently covers live video telemedicine for certain services and remote patient monitoring through home health agencies with prior authorization. Telephone evaluation and management services provided by a qualified health care professional to an established patient, parent, or guardian is reimbursed for certain codes. Insurers, including Medicaid, cannot exclude from coverage a service solely because the service is provided through telemedicine when such service is delivered by a health care provider (KSA 40-2,213(b)).

State Employee Health Plan

The Kansas State Employee Health Plan (SEHP) issued a memorandum related to benefits and COVID-19. Through December 31, 2020, SEHP partners Aetna Better Health of Kansas and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas (BCBSKS)provided 24/7 access to telehealth services with a virtual doctor’s office and waived the member cost share.

After the PHE, Aetna and BCBSKS continue to provide 24/7 access to telehealth services for SEHP members. Aetna offers access to services through Teladoc by phone, video, or app, with copayments ranging from $10 to $190 depending on the insurance plan and type of visit. BCBSKS offers telehealth services through Amwell via smartphone or app, with copayments beginning at $10 or $59 depending on the plan and type of consultation.

Executive Orders

On March 20, 2020, the Governor signed Executive Order No. 20-08, which temporarily expanded telemedicine access and addressed certain licensing requirements to combat the effects of COVID-19. The order encouraged physicians to utilize telemedicine and prevented the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Board) from enforcing any statute, rule, or regulation that would require physicians to conduct an in-person examination of a patient prior to prescribing medication, including controlled substances. The order allowed for out-of-state physicians, who hold unrestricted licenses to practice medicine in the state in which they practice medicine and are not the subject of an investigation or disciplinary proceeding, to treat Kansans through telemedicine upon notice to the Board.

Executive Order No. 20-35 extended the provisions of Executive Order No. 20-08 until June 30, 2020.

The Office of Recovery; Broadbrand Development

The Governor established the Office of Recovery within the Office of the Governor in 2020; within the Office of Recovery, the Strengthening People and Revitalizing Kansas (SPARK) Task Force was created, consisting of a 5-member executive committee and a 15-member steering committee. The SPARK Task Force was tasked with making recommendations to the Governor on how $1.03 billion state Coronavirus Relief Fund moneys, received through the CARES Act and appropriated in 2020 Special Session HB 2016, should be allocated. An Investment Dashboard on the Office of Recovery’s website outlines the various programs and funding levels created to expend the money before December 30, 2020.

According to the Investment Dashboard, $10 million of the funds was allocated through the Kansas Department of Commerce to address broadband connectivity issues including barriers to telehealth and to create a Provider Partnership Support Program that works with internet service providers to expedite deployment of assistance for vulnerable populations and families.

On July 14, 2022, the Governor announced an $83.5 million grant program through the Kansas Department of Commerce’s Office of Broadband Development, part of Kansas’ Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (CPF) broadband infrastructure plan. The program prioritizes bringing broadband infrastructure to areas that lack access to high-speed internet in order to support work, education, and health care monitoring. Applicants to the program were required to match some percentage of awarded funds, with lower match amounts for lower-served areas of the state. The third and final round of grantees were announced in January 2023. A total of 24 projects were awarded grant funds, pledging to provide 24,500 homes, businesses, schools, health care facilities, and other public institutions access to fast, reliable internet for the first time. Projects are expected to be completed by the end of 2026.

  1. Buprenorphine is the first medication to treat opioid use disorder that can be prescribed or dispensed in physician offices. It is a opioid partial agonist and produces effects such as euphoria or respiratory depression at low to moderate doses, with weaker effects than full opioid agonists like methadone. When taken as prescribed, buprenorphine diminishes withdrawal symptoms and physical dependency on opioids. ↩︎

by Leighann Thone, PhD
Research Analyst
785-
296-4181