Second Supplement to Preliminary Summary of Legislation 2025

This publication contains summaries of selected bills passed by the Legislature from April 10, 2025, through adjournment on April 11, 2025. Bills that have not yet been signed by the Governor are included.

The first Preliminary Summary 2025 containing summaries of major bills that were passed through the end of the legislative day on March 21 was distributed on March 27, 2025. An updated Supplement to Preliminary Summary 2025 was distributed on April 3, 2025.

Highlights, a summary of major legislation in newsletter form, will be prepared and mailed to legislators as soon as possible. The Summary of Legislation, which accounts for all bills passed by the 2025 Legislature, will be distributed at a later date.

Supplement to Preliminary Summary of Legislation 2025

This updated version of the March 27, 2025, publication contains summaries of selected bills passed by the Legislature from March 24 to adjournment on March 27. Bills that have not yet been signed by the Governor are included.

The first Preliminary Summary containing summaries of major bills that were passed through March 21, 2025, was distributed on March 27, 2025. A final supplement will be mailed after the wrap-up session in April.

Highlights, a summary of major legislation in newsletter form, will be prepared and mailed to legislators as soon as possible after the Session. Summary of Legislation, which accounts for all bills passed by the 2025 Legislature, will be distributed at a later date.

Taxes on Electric Vehicle Charging

This memorandum provides information regarding the equivalency in power generated from a gallon of gasoline and a kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity. It reviews energy equivalence, state taxes on electricity sold as vehicle fuel, additional features of laws regarding electricity as fuel, and calculation of fiscal effect.

Download a PDF of this memo here.

Equivalency Between a Gallon of Gasoline and a Kilowatt-hour

In its April 2023 notice of proposed rulemaking on updates to the Petroleum-equivalent Fuel Economy Calculation (10 CFR Part 474) used to determine corporate average fuel economy for fleets of light-duty vehicles, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) states, “The energy content of a gallon of gasoline is 115,000 British Thermal Units (Btu) [a measure of the heat content of a fuel]. With a standard conversion factor of 3.412 Btu/Wh, the same gallon of gasoline can be said to have an energy content of 33,705 watt hours (Wh).” The figure of 33.7 kWh/gallon is commonly used.

The DOE is amending those values with publication of a final rule effective June 12, 2024.1 The petroleum-equivalency factor (PEF) established by this final rule will establish a PEF of 29,996 watt hours (Wh) for vehicles of model years 2030 and later.

Using these DOE equivalencies, a tax of $0.24 per gallon of gasoline (the current Kansas rate) would translate to a tax of $0.07 per kWh using the current standard of 33,705 Wh per gallon and a tax of $0.08 per kWh using the upcoming PEF of 29,996 Wh per gallon.

Another approach to this question is the number of kWh or gallons it takes, on average, to drive 100 miles. Data from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Statistics Series for 2023, the most recent available, indicate the average fuel consumption was 4.05 gallons per 100 miles for light-duty vehicles with short wheelbases and 4.42 gallons per 100 miles for all light-duty vehicles. Information on the fuel economy of model year 2023 vehicles from the DOE, at www.fueleconomy.gov, shows a combined fuel economy range of 24 to 69 kWh per 100 miles, with an average of 37.5 kWh per 100 miles, for all-electric vehicles and an average of 23 miles per gallon, or 4.35 gallons per 100 miles, for gasoline-powered vehicles.2

Taxes on Electricity Used as a Vehicle Fuel

A tax of $0.03 per kWh has been imposed in at least four states, but some rates for electricity as a vehicle fuel are variable or not per kWh. Taxes on electricity used as vehicle fuel were found for the following eight states:

  • Georgia: For the purposes of determining the tax, the statute ties the tax rate for alternative fuels, such as compressed natural gas, electricity, and hydrogen, to Georgia’s variable motor fuel tax. The motor fuel tax of $0.26 per gallon has been adjusted each year since 2016 based on fuel economy and the Consumer Price Index; the tax on a fuel is to be set by its Department of Revenue “in accordance with and measured by the nearest power potential equivalent to that of one gallon of regular grade gasoline.” Georgia law sets standards for that equivalent, including that the gallon equivalent of electricity “shall not be more than 11 kilowatt-hours.” (2023 SB 146; Ga. Code Ann., §48-9-3(a)(4)(A)(ii))3
  • Iowa: “An excise tax of two and six-tenths cents is imposed on each kilowatt hour of electric fuel delivered or placed into the battery or other energy storage device of an electric motor vehicle at a location in this state other than a residence.” (I.C.A. §452A.41; 2019 HF 767)
  • Kentucky: “An excise tax with an initial base rate of three cents ($0.03) per kilowatt hour is imposed on electric vehicle power distributed in this state by an electric vehicle power dealer for the purpose of charging electric vehicles in this state” starting January 1, 2024. The rate is to be adjusted each January 1, based on the National Highway Construction Cost Index 2.0, within certain limits. (KRS §138.477; 2022 HB 8; 2024 HB 122)
  • Montana: Effective July 1, 2023, there is a tax of $0.03 per kWh or its equivalent in addition to the public utility’s approved rate on the electric current used to charge or recharge the battery or batteries of an electric vehicle at public charging stations installed after July 1, 2023. This tax extends to “legacy” public charging stations as of July 1, 2025. The charging station owner may retain $0.0025 per kWh for costs associated with administering the tax. (MCA 15-70- 802)
  • Oklahoma: The state imposes “a tax of three cents ($0.03) per kilowatt hour or its equivalent, as determined by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, on the electric current used to charge or recharge the battery or batteries of an electric vehicle.” (68 Okl. St. Ann. § 6504; 2021 HB 2234; 2023 HB 2315)
  • Pennsylvania: $0.0172 per kWh, for 2025. Pennsylvania’s fuel taxes vary based on the price of gasoline. Since 1997, rates for alternative fuels have been based on a “gallon equivalent basis” and are subject to change annually; each year’s rate is published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. (A Pennsylvania Department of Revenue website shows fuel tax rates for electricity back to 2013.) (75 Pa.C.S.A. § 9004)
  • Utah: Electric current sold by a charging-station operator to charge or recharge an electric vehicle is taxed at 12.5 percent, whether by the kWh or as a subscription fee. (2023 HB 301; U.C.A. 1953 §59-30-102) A similar tax as a percentage of fuel price is imposed on other motor vehicle fuels, with maximum fuel prices for purposes of this tax established in law. (U.C.A. 1953 §59-13-201)

The bills either tax specifically electricity sold at vehicle charging stations or tax all electricity used as vehicle fuel but with exceptions for electricity provided at a residence, as in Georgia, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin. Oklahoma excludes charging stations with charging capacity of less than 50 kilowatts and those that do not require payment for use. Kentucky defines an “electric vehicle power dealer,” who must collect the tax, as a person who owns or leases an electric vehicle charging station with a charging capacity of at least 20 kilowatts. Montana defines a “charging station” to mean equipment with a rated capacity greater than 25 kilowatts that is not installed at a residence or owned by an association of owners of real property. Montana and Oklahoma specify the tax does not apply to fees or charges associated with the method of payment.

The bills establishing these taxes provide definitions of the terms used and address additional topics, including the following:

  • Licensing or registering electric fuel businesses: Georgia, Iowa, Montana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin;
  • Directing the proceeds of the tax to a transportation-related fund: Iowa (Road Use Tax Fund), Kentucky (Road Fund); Montana (proceeds remitted to the Department of Transportation), Oklahoma (Driving on Road Infrastructure with Vehicles of Electricity [DRIVE] Revolving Fund), Utah (Transportation Fund), and Wisconsin (Transportation Fund);
  • Requiring the rate per kWh to be posted: Georgia (total of price and tax or posted separately), Montana, Oklahoma (also on the owner or operator’s website or app), and Utah (in a required itemized invoice to the purchaser)4;
  • Directing specific state agencies to administer the tax: Iowa, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wisconsin;
  • Assigning responsibility for inspection of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations: Georgia (Commissioner of Agriculture), Iowa (Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship5), and Oklahoma (Tax Commission);
    • The Kansas Department of Agriculture (KDA) provided the following response to an inquiry as to whether it would have authority to inspect vehicle charging stations: “We do have the authority to test electric vehicle chargers pursuant to K.S.A. 83-206. However, we will not have the necessary standards to apply to the testing of those devices until the 2024 versions of NIST handbook 44 and NIST handbook 130 are adopted in regulation, as the currently adopted version of the handbook does not provide standards for inspection and testing of electric vehicle fueling systems and methods of sale. We intend to pursue these regulatory updates after we can get some statutory amendments adopted during this legislative session”; and
    • 2025 HB 2255, as approved by the House on February 20, 2025, includes provisions regarding the KDA’s authority to test EV chargers;
  • Requiring meters for charging stations: Georgia, Montana, and Oklahoma (on meters placed into service after November 1, 2021);
  • Changing an EV registration fee: Kentucky (imposing an EV ownership fee), Montana (reducing any additional EV registration fee by 30 percent, as of July 1, 2028), and Pennsylvania (imposing an EV road user charge);
  • Exempting electricity sold at an EV charging station from sales tax: Iowa (added electricity exemption to those of other vehicle fuels) and Wisconsin;
    • According to Kansas Department of Revenue Pub. KS-1510 Sales Tax and Compensating Use Tax, “Residential and agricultural use of the utilities (except water) are subject only to local tax—the state sales tax of 6.50% does not apply to utilities used for a residential or agricultural purpose. Water for residential and agricultural use is exempt from both state and local sales tax”6; and
  • Specifying penalties for violations: Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Utah.

Certain aspects of the bills were unique to one state, e.g., providing for refunds of the tax to entities that do not pay taxes on gasoline or diesel fuel (Iowa), regulating government-owned charging stations (Wisconsin), and requiring a utility to create a separate entity to sell electricity at EV charging stations (Georgia).

Fiscal Effects

Equivalents to Kansas fiscal notes on bills were found for only two of the states imposing kWh taxes on electricity sold as vehicle fuel. The fiscal note for Kentucky 2022 HB 8 contained no estimate of revenues from the $0.03 tax imposed per kWh, and a “local mandate” fiscal note on a similar bill also imposing a $0.03 per kWh tax and a registration fee on electric and hybrid vehicles states “Revenue from the excise tax is indeterminable at this time.”

The fiscal note from Wisconsin on its 2023 bill, as introduced, included the following:

In its fiscal estimate to the bill, the Department of Transportation (DOT) estimates revenue from the 3-cent per kilowatt-hour charging station excise tax to be $15,900 to $23,800 per month, at the start of calendar year 2024, or up to $286,000 for all of 2024. DOT further indicates that assuming the growth rate in EV ownership remains constant, estimated revenue would range from $211,400 to $314,100 in 2024-25 and $285,100 to $427,600 in 2025-26. To arrive at this estimate, the Department assumes that the average efficiency for an electric vehicle is 3.5 miles per kilowatt-hour, and that the annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for the average electric vehicle is 5,300 miles per year, which is significantly lower than the average annual VMT of gas and diesel vehicles which is typically between 11,000 and 14,000 miles. In addition, DOT indicates that since charging an electric vehicle at home is more cost-effective and convenient for the consumer, a 20% to 30% usage of public charging stations was assumed by the Department…….. DOR estimates that the sales and use tax exemption would reduce sales tax revenue by $1,300,000 annually. . . . Using DOT assumptions, it is estimated that the exemption would reduce sales tax revenues by between $50,000 and $80,000 in 2024-25 and by between $120,000 and $180,000 in 2025-26.

The Wisconsin fiscal note does not include the number of EVs in the state. Data from the DOE indicate 24,943 EVs in Wisconsin in 2023 and 11,271 in Kansas.

A policy analyst with the Utah Legislature provided the following information in September 2024:

“Utah’s kWh charging tax went into effect January 1, 2024. From Jan. 1, 2024 – May 31, 2024 (5 months), the tax generated $239,402. Utah’s 2024 fleet as of Feb. 15, 2024, was 2,942,473 registered on- highway vehicles (includes motorcycles, passenger vehicles, light trucks, and heavy trucks). Of those, 37,175 are fully electric (1.25%); 76,598 are gas hybrid (2.6%); 11,777 are plug-in hybrid (0.4%). Passenger vehicles totaled 1,126,505 registrations; of those, 18,071 are electric (1.6%); 39,454 are hybrid (3.5%); and 5,253 are plug-in hybrids (0.47%).”

Calculation of Fiscal Effect

The Assistant Director of Legislative Economic Analysis for the Kentucky Legislative Research Commission noted multiple assumptions would be required to determine fiscal effect:

  • How many EVs are registered in Kansas? How many EVs pass through Kansas, and would that number change if Kansas imposed a kWh fee?
    • According to the Division of Vehicles, Kansas Department of Revenue, in 2023 8,195 electric and 27,170 hybrid vehicles were registered in Kansas. Of those hybrid vehicles, 1,245 were plug-in electric hybrid vehicles. As noted above, the DOE reported 11,271 electric vehicles in Kansas; and
    • No estimate was found for the number of any types of vehicles that pass through Kansas, although the Kansas Turnpike Authority estimates about half of the vehicles using the Turnpike originate from out of the state7.
  • How many miles does each car drive each year?
    • Estimates vary. One large study found electric passenger vehicles of model years 2016–2022 were driven an average of 7,165 miles a year for smaller vehicles and 10,184 miles a year for sport utility vehicles (SUVs). (More detail is provided below.)
  • Where does the charging occur?
    • Data are not readily available on this. Multiple secondary sources state the DOE found 80 percent of charging is at home, but a search of the DOE website did not find the original data. A 2024 report from ChargeLab, a company that “builds software for managing electric vehicle chargers,” on results of a survey of 500 U.S. EV drivers found that, “While 86.0% of EV drivers now have access to a home charger, 59.6% still use public chargers weekly.” This may be because home chargers are Level 1 (120- volt) or Level 2 (240-volt), whereas commercial chargers are more likely to be faster Level 3 chargers.
  • What is the conversion rate between miles driven and kWhs?
    • See the first section of this memorandum.

FHWA data do not provide information by type of fuel, but they do provide information on averages. The averages for light-duty vehicles for 2023 (the most recent year available when this memorandum was prepared) were 11,106 annual miles driven and 492 gallons of fuel consumed.

As noted above, DOE fuel economy data for model year 2023 all-electric passenger vehicles show a combined fuel economy range of 24 to 69 kWh per 100 miles, with an average of 37.5 kWh per 100 miles, and an average mile per gallon equivalent (mpge) of 94.2.8

The data presented could be used to make assumptions on a per-vehicle basis, shown using 2023 data:

  • The gasoline tax for a conventional light-duty vehicle traveling 11,100 miles a year (approximate FHWA average) using 490 gallons (approximate FHWA average) and purchasing all that fuel in Kansas with its gasoline tax rate of $0.24 per gallon would be $117.60, or $0.0106 per mile driven.
  • If a tax of $0.03 were applied to each kWh and all the electricity were purchased at a charger at which the tax would be applied, the tax on an all-electric vehicle traveling 11,100 miles a year using 37.5 kWh per 100 miles (DOE average) would pay $124.90 in tax, or $0.01125 per mile driven.
    • If the miles driven by an all-electric vehicle were reduced to 8,000 miles a year, the tax would be $90.
  • A vehicle traveling 11,100 miles a year getting 94.2 mpg (average mpge for model year 2023 all-electric vehicles) would pay $28.30 in gasoline tax at $0.24 per gallon.
    • If the miles driven by an all-electric vehicle getting 94.2 mpg were reduced to 8,000 miles a year, the gasoline tax would be $20.40.

The calculations above address the amount of tax only and do not take into consideration the generally higher prices for all-electric vehicles, the cost of gasoline excluding taxes ($2.81 per gallon, as of March 10, 2025, in Kansas9), or the average rate per kWh ($0.1156 per kWh, as of March 2025, in Kansas10).

Miles driven. The calculations above also do not reflect whether electric passenger vehicles are driven more or fewer miles annually than conventional-fuel passenger vehicles. Data vary. FHWA data based on the 2022 National Household Travel Survey (the most recent available as of publication of this memorandum) and published by the DOE state gasoline- powered vehicles were driven an average of 14,133 miles in 2022 and all-electric vehicles were driven an average of 12,393 miles.11

A study published in 202312 reviewed dealership records of 12.5 million used cars and 11.4 million used SUVs driven in the United States in 2016 through 2022. It found the following regarding average annual miles driven:

  • Conventional gasoline cars: 11,642 miles;
  • Battery electric cars: 7,165 miles;
  • Conventional gasoline SUVs: 12,979 miles; and
  • Battery electric SUVs: 10,184 miles driven.

The study noted the ranges for EVs have continued to improve over time, which may be leading to more miles driven annually. The DOE provided ranges for 33 2023 EV models; the average was 276 miles. Researchers associated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that, “Once one accounts for battery range, the sharp difference in annual miles driven between EVs and gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles goes away for long-range EVs.”13 Information from the International Energy Agency shows average range for a battery EV at 21 miles (211 kilometers) in 2015 and 210 miles (338 km) in 2020. EPA data for 2024 model electric vehicles available in the United States show an average range of 291.5 miles.14

Download a PDF of this memo here.

Footnotes

  1.  The final rule, 89 FR 22041, provides background on the DOE requirements and how they are used. Federal law has required fuel economy standards for automobiles produced in, or imported into, the United States since 1975. Law since the late 1970s has required the DOE to calculate petroleum equivalence for electric vehicles, which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency uses to determine compliance with corporate average fuel economy standards.
  2.  These numbers were calculated by KLRD and represent all models listed by the DOE in the 2023 Datafile. They do not represent weighted averages based on actual sales or usage. (For example, it would be expected that more Chevrolet Bolt models are sold than Porsche Taycan models.) DOE listings, calculated using data gathered under laboratory conditions, for 2024 all-electric models show a median of 38 kWh per 100 miles, with the most efficient quartile at 33 and the least efficient quartile at 63 kWh per 100 miles.
  3.  In 2022, Georgia’s Joint Study Committee on the Electrification of Transportation reviewed multiple aspects of this topic. Its 500-plus-page final report does not include any information on the origin of the “no more than 11 kilowatt-hours” equivalence. The equivalence was not addressed specifically in testimony to the House.
  4.  The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, 2024 Handbook, requires kWh to be the unit of measurement for “electric vehicle supply equipment” in its standards for Electric Vehicle Fueling Systems. Standard 3.40 also requires the devices to be “capable of indicating the start and stop time, the total quantity of energy delivered, the unit price, and the total price for the quantity of energy delivered during each discrete phase corresponding to one of the multiple unit prices.”
  5.  Added by Iowa 2023 HF 666.
  6.  See also KSA 12-189a.
  7.  Personal conversations with the Kansas Turnpike Authority Director of Business Services and Customer Relations. No breakdown on commercial versus passenger vehicles was available. Additional data is expected to become available from the cashless tolling system after July 2025.
  8.  These calculations do not represent weighted averages based on actual sales or usage or the actual electric-vehicle fleet.
  9.  https://gasprices.aaa.com
  10.  https://www.electricchoice.com/electricity-prices-by-state/
  11.  Fact of the Week #1337, based on the 2022 National Household Travel Survey
  12.  Quantifying electric vehicle mileage in the United States, Lujin Zhao, Elizabeth R. Ottinger, Arthur Hong Chun Yip, John Paul Helveston, Joule, Volume 7, Issue 11, 15 November 2023, pages 2537 – 2551.
  13.  How Much Are Electric Vehicles Driven? Depends on the EV,” Climate Portal, MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, January 26, 2023, accessed February 2025.
  14.  International Energy Agency, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/evolution-of-average-range-of-electric-vehicles-by-powertrain-2010-2021; EPA data compiled at https://insideevs.com/reviews/344001/compare-evs/

Special City and County Highway Fund Distributions

Vehicle-fuel tax moneys are directed to the Special City and County Highway Fund (SCCHF) and the State Highway Fund (SHF): since 2003, 33.63 percent to the SCCHF and 66.37 percent to the SHF. Since 1970, 57.0 percent of the SCCHF is distributed to counties and 43.0 percent to cities. Distributions to counties and cities from the SCCHF averaged $146.8 million during the FY 2010–FY 2020 Transportation Works for Kansas program and $153.1 million in FY 2021–FY 2024, the first years of the Eisenhower Legacy Transportation Program (known as IKE).

This memorandum provides information on the history of the SCCHF, distributions of the motor-vehicle fuel tax to the SCCHF and SHF over time, the revenues available for distribution, how amounts have been and are distributed among counties and cities, and restrictions on uses of SCCHF funds. Unless otherwise specified, years listed refer to calendar years. Amounts distributed by fiscal year (since 1985) are provided.

Download a PDF of the complete report here:
Special City and County Highway Fund Distributions

Technology-Enabled Fiduciary Financial Institutions Act

Summary

The Technology-enabled Fiduciary Financial Institutions (TEFFI) Act was enacted in 2021 Senate Sub. for HB 2074 and can be found in KSA 9-2301 through 9-2327.

The bill required the State Bank Commissioner to issue a charter to The Beneficient Company (Ben) and establish a fiduciary financial (fidfin) institution pilot program with an economic growth zone designated in Harvey County. The chartered TEFFI is known as Beneficent Fiduciary Financial (BFF), LLC. As of November 2024, BFF is believed to be the only TEFFI in the United States.

TEFFIs manage alternative assets, defined as professionally managed investment assets that are not publicly traded, including, but not limited to:

  • private equity;
  • venture capital;
  • leveraged buyouts;
  • special situations;
  • structured credit;
  • private debt;
  • private real estate funds; and
  • natural resources, including any economic or beneficial interest therein.

Economic Growth Trust

When alternative assets are placed into new Kansas trusts with Ben, 2.5 percent of the total amount of financing provided is funneled into the Kansas TEFFI Economic Growth Trust, which then distributes funding to the following:

  • Kansas Department of Commerce TEFFI Development and Expansion Fund, for
    the
    • Strategic Economic Expansion & Development (SEED) Program; and
    • Promotion of growth and development of the TEFFI industry; and
  • Beneficient Heartland Foundation.

Timeline

July 1, 2021Senate Sub. for HB 2074 established the TEFFI Act, which directed the State Bank Commissioner to issue a conditional charter to Ben and establish a fidfin institution pilot program, among other things.
December 7, 2021Joint Committee on Fiduciary Financial Institutions Oversight held first meeting and recommended permanent TEFFI charter be issued.
March 10, 2022SB 337 converted the conditional charter to a permanent charter, retroactive to December 31, 2021.
July 1, 2022HB 2489 amended the TEFFI Act, pertaining to an updated definition, fingerprinting requirement, existing application fee, governing documents, evaluation and examination, customer disclosure, and services and authorized activities.
HB 2547 authorized TEFFI insurance companies to operate as captive insurance companies.
December 1, 2022Joint Committee on Fiduciary Financial Institutions Oversight met and recommended amendments to the TEFFI Act regarding background checks and the definition of charitable beneficiaries.
April 20, 2023SB 44 established the Kansas Financial Institutions Information Security Act and included TEFFIs as covered entities.
November 7, 2023Joint Committee on Fiduciary Financial Institutions Oversight met and recommended the creation of an advisory council.
November 21, 2024Joint Committee on Fiduciary Financial Institutions Oversight met and made various recommendations, including changes regarding TEFFI reporting, digital assets, the definition of charitable beneficiaries, the safety and soundness examination, and liquidation processes.

Download a PDF of this memo here.

States’ Fees for Electric and Hybrid Vehicles

Although electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid vehicles comprise less than 1.0 percent and 2.8 percent of all vehicles in operation, respectively, they are increasing as a percentage of sales.1,2 To make up for traditional motor fuel tax revenue not received for these vehicles, an increasing number of states—39 to date—have imposed separate fees on EVs, hybrid vehicles, or both. This memorandum summarizes these fees on passenger vehicles and provides additional information on them. The states with these fees were identified using information from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).3 Statutory and other sources are listed at the end of this memorandum.

Continue reading for the full report, or download a PDF copy here.

Amounts of Fees

Annual fees for EVs and hybrid vehicles range from $30 to $400. Except for Kansas’ fees, the fees listed exclude registration fees applied to all vehicles; the standard fees are discussed below.

Terms used for EVs and hybrid vehicles and their definitions are not consistent from state to state, and some states apply fees to all types of vehicles using fuels not clasified and taxed as motor fuels. Kansas applies these fees to “electric hybrid or plug-in electric hybrid vehicles” and “all-electric vehicles.” The fees listed below use those categories as much as possible. Also, fees in some states are adjusted annually for inflation; 2025 amounts are reported if readily available. Not all of the 39 states have a fee for both types of vehicles.

Electric Vehicles

  • $50—Colorado, Colorado, Hawaii, and South Dakota. Hawaii also imposes a state mileage-based road usage charge of $0.8 cents per mile, capped at $50, based on odometer readings at inspection;
  • $57.19—Colorado, for FY 2024-2025; adjusted annually. Colorado also imposes an EV road usage fee at registration, $12 in 2025, and increasing annually;
  • $60—South Carolina, $120 biennially;
  • $75—Minnesota and Nebraska;
  • $89—Vermont;
  • $90—Missouri;
  • $100—California, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan (≥8,000 lbs., $200), and New Hampshire. [Note: Only Kansas’ fee is in lieu of other registration fees and not in addition to them.];
  • $110—Louisiana;
  • $115—Oregon. Oregon also imposes a fee on traditional-fueled vehicles based on mpg: ≤19 mpg, $20; 20‒39 mpg, $25; ≥ 40 mpg, $35;
  • $120—Kentucky and North Dakota;
  • $125—Maryland;
  • $128.14—Virginia. A highway use fee also is applied to alternative fuel, electric, and hybrid vehicles. The statutory formula is 85 percent of the difference in motor fuel taxes paid for a vehicle with a combined fuel economy of 23.7 miles per gallon (mpg) and the vehicle being registered over the average number of miles traveled by a passenger vehicle in the Commonwealth, as determined by the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles: [((average miles traveled x fuels tax rate) / 23.7) – ((average miles traveled x fuels tax rate) / vehicle’s mpg rating)] x 0.85;
  • $130—Iowa and Montana (≥6,000 lbs.–10,000 lbs., $190). Montana statutes also authorize a permanent registration fee, $260 or $380, depending on weight;
  • $130.25—Utah;4
  • $140—Idaho;
  • $150—Mississippi and Nebraska;
  • $175—Wisconsin;
  • $180—North Carolina and Washington;
  • $200—Alabama, Arkansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania (in 2025; will be $250 in 2026 and then adjusted annually), Tennessee, Texas (registration renewal), West Virginia, and Wyoming;
  • $210—Oklahoma, ≤ 6,000 lbs. ($258 if 6,001 lbs.-10,000 lbs.);
  • $219.84—Georgia, in FY 2024, after an annual adjustment for inflation;
  • $230—Indiana, adjusted annually;
  • $250—New Jersey, to increase $10 per year through FY 2029; and
  • $400—Texas, for a new registration.

Hybrid Vehicles (noted if the statute specifies a plug-in hybrid)

  • $21.75—Utah, $16.50 six-month option;5
  • $30—Michigan ($100 if >8,000 lbs.) and South Carolina ($60 biennial fee);
  • $44.50—Vermont, for plug-in hybrids;
  • $50—Arkansas, Kansas, North Dakota, and Pennsylvania (in 2025; will be $62.50 in 2026 and then adjusted annually) [Note: Only Kansas’ fee is in lieu of other registration fees and not in addition to them.];
  • $56.50—Utah, for plug-in hybrid; $43.50 six-month option;
  • $57.19—Colorado, for FY 2024-2025, adjusted annually. Colorado also imposes an EV road usage fee at registration, $8 in 2025 and increasing annually;
  • $60—Louisiana, Missouri (adjusted annually), and South Carolina (biennially);
  • $65—Iowa, for plug-in hybrid;
  • $70—Montana, for plug-in hybrid ($100 if ≥6,000 lbs. and ≤10,000 lbs.). Montana statutes also authorize a permanent registration fee, $140 or $200, depending on weight;
  • $75—Idaho (plug-in hybrid), Mississippi, Nebraska (plug-in hybrid), Washington, and Wisconsin;
  • $77—Indiana, adjusted annually;
  • $90—North Carolina, for plug-in hybrid;
  • $100—Alabama (plug-in hybrid), Arkansas (plug-in hybrid), Maryland, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia;
  • $112—Oklahoma ($148 if 6,000 lbs.–10,000 lbs.);
  • $120—Kentucky, new in 2025, will be adjusted annually. [Note: The definition of an EV includes any vehicle with plug-in charging capability.]; and
  • $150—Ohio, for plug-in hybrids.

Uses of the Fees Specific to Electric and Hybrid Vehicles

Of the 39 states that charge these fees, 27 direct fees collected for EVs and hybrid vehicles to their equivalents of Kansas’ State Highway Fund, according to NCSL. Other states direct the revenues elsewhere, with some dividing them. These divisions may include between state, county, and city governments.

  • Use for EV infrastructure—Vermont;
  • Divide between the general transportation fund and fund for EV infrastructure—Alabama, Colorado, Oklahoma, and Washington;
  • Divide between the general transportation fund and a different special fund—Alabama (with local transportation fund and EV infrastructure fund), Idaho (with local highway funds), Illinois ($1 of additional fee is allocated to the Secretary of State Special Services Fund), Michigan (with a scrap tire regulation fund), Ohio (with a fund allocated to municipalities, counties, and townships), Tennessee ($1 to Police Pay Supplement Fund and the rest allocated to the state highway fund, municipalities, counties, and the general fund), and West Virginia (hybrid fees allocated to State Road Fund); and
  • Place into a different special fund—Indiana (local road and bridge matching grant fund).

Dates of Enactment of the Initial Electric Vehicle Fees

Most states that currently require fees for EVs, hybrid vehicles, or both initially enacted those fees in 2017 and later, and some precede 2011. Most state EV fee statutes have subsequently been amended.

2011—Nebraska;

2013—Colorado and North Carolina;

2014—Virginia;

2015—Georgia and Michigan;

2016—Wyoming;

2017—California, Idaho, Indiana, Minnesota, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wisconsin;

2018—Mississippi and Utah;

2019—Alabama, Arkansas, Hawaii (flat fee), Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, North Dakota, Ohio, and Washington;

2021—Oklahoma and South Dakota;

2022—Kentucky and Louisiana;

2023—Hawaii (road usage charge), Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas; and

2024—Maryland, Nebraska, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.

Missouri began imposing fees on alternative fuel vehicles in 1998 and added hybrid vehicle fees in 2018. In 2020, Virginia reduced its registration fees but enacted its Highway Use Fee and Mileage-based User Fee Program, tying fees to vehicle mpg.

Adjustments to the Fees

Statutes of 14 of the 39 states provide for some sort of automatic adjustment to the fees on EVs or hybrid vehicles.

  • Adjustments based on inflation. California, Colorado, Indiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah base adjustments on changes in the inflation rate, generally using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) with some specifying the CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U);
  • California specifies the California Consumer Price Index;
  • Colorado limits an annual increase to 5 percent, regardless of whether inflation exceeds that rate;
  • Indiana’s adjustment averages changes in CPI-U and Indiana personal income;
  • Kentucky’s adjustments are based on the National Highway Construction Cost Index, starting in 2025;
  • Maryland’s adjustments for inflation begin annually in FY 2026;
  • Pennsylvania’s adjustment averages changes in CPI-U beginning in 2027; and
  • Tennessee’s annual adjustments for inflation, based on CPI-U, begin in 2028, and are limited to 3 percent;
  • Adjustments based on fuel efficiency. Georgia law states the fee is to be adjusted by multiplying the percentage of increase or decrease in U.S. average mpg against the current fee. An alternative fuel logo or emblem on a license plate allows the vehicle to use lanes reserved for motorcycles and high-occupancy vehicles. Virginia’s formula for its highway use fee is based in part on the fuel efficiency of the vehicle;
  • Adjustment based on fuel tax rates. Michigan law states adjustments will be based on increases in the state fuel tax, by $2.50 for a hybrid vehicle and $5.00 for each all-electric vehicle for each 1 cent above 19 cents per gallon in fuel tax. The statutory state fuel tax of 26.3 cents per gallon on gasoline and also on diesel fuel is indexed for inflation and currently 31 cents per gallon;
  • Adjustments of a set amount. Alabama law states its fees will increase $3 every four years, starting in 2023. Colorado increases its added “road usage equalization fee” of $4 ($3 for a hybrid) by $4 or more each subsequent year through FY 2032. Missouri law specifies its alternative vehicle fees will increase by 20 percent a year for 5 years starting in 2022. New Jersey specifies a $10 increase every year from 2024 into 2028. Tennessee specifies a $74 increase in 2027 then begins to adjust for inflation; and
  • Adjustment based on miles driven. Virginia’s formula for its highway use fee is based in part on the average number of miles traveled by a passenger vehicle in the state.

Base Registration Amounts

More than half of the states with fees for EVs, hybrid vehicles, or both have flat fees for registration of passenger vehicles. In some states, however, those flat fees vary based on various factors. Unless specified otherwise, all fees listed are annual. This memorandum does not address other fees or taxes, such as the Kansas motor vehicle tax, that may be charged at vehicle registration.

  • Based on weight. Arkansas (≤3,000 lbs., $17; 3,001-4,500 lbs., $25; ≥4,501 lbs., $30); Kansas (≤4,500 lbs., $30; >4,500 lbs., $40); Maryland (≤3,500 lbs., $70,50; >3,500 lbs.‒≤3,700 lbs., $80.50; >3,700 lbs., $121.50); Michigan (<3,000 lbs., $29; 3,001–3,500 lbs., $32; increases by $5 for each additional 500 lbs.); New Jersey (≤3,500 lbs, $25; >3,500 lbs, $50); Oklahoma (≤6,000 lbs., $110; ≥6,001 lbs. ≤10,000 lbs., $158); Pennsylvania (≤14,000 lbs); Virginia (≤4,000 lbs., $23; >4,000 lbs., $28);
  • Based on vehicle age. Idaho (1-2 years old, $69; 3-6 years old, $57; 7+ years old, $45); Oklahoma (registration years 1-4, $85; years 5-8, $75; years 9-12, $55; years 13-16, $35; years 17 and subsequent, $15);
  • Based on value. Nebraska, $15 + $5-$30 based on base value when new;
  • Based on age of the registrant. South Carolina, age 65 or older or “handicapped,” $36; age 64, $36; age 63 and younger, $40; and
  • Based on a combination:
  • Colorado—weight (≤2,000 lbs, $6; ≤4,500 lbs., $6 + $0.20/100 lbs or fraction thereof) + vehicle age (<7 years old, $12; 7-10 years old, $12; ≥10 years, $7);
  • Hawaii—flat fee + weight tax of $0.0125/lb., minimum $12;
  • Iowa—1 percent of value + $0.40/100 lbs;
  • Louisiana—flat fee + $1 for each $1,000 in value;
  • Minnesota—$10 +1.25 percent (if first registered before November 15, 2020) or 1.285 percent (if first registered after that date) of manufacturer’s suggested retail price, adjusted by age (second year, 90 percent of price, decreasing in increments of 10 percent to 10 percent in the tenth year) to $25 for the eleventh and succeeding years;
  • North Dakota—gross weight + years the vehicle has been registered, decreased as the vehicle ages (3,200‒4,499 lbs, years 1‒6, $93; years 7‒9, $81; years 10‒12, $69; years 13+, $57);
  • Oregon—flat fee + miles per gallon (for a 2-year registration: ≤19 mpg, $126; 20‒39 mpg, $136; 40+ mpg, $156 or $86 if participating in a pay-by-mile program);
  • South Dakota—weight (≤2,000 lbs, $36; 2,001‒4,000 lbs., $72; 4,001‒6,000 lbs,$108; >6,000 lbs, $144) + age (70 percent if vehicle is ≥10 years old as of January 1 of the license fee year); and
  • Wyoming—flat fee + factory price + age (3 percent of a percentage of the price depending on the vehicle’s year of service).

Applicability of Fees to Other Alternative Fuels

While most of the state statutes specified “electric vehicle,” “hybrid vehicle,” or a similar term, some apply special fees to vehicles powered by more types of alternative fuels:

  • California applies its fee to a “zero emission vehicle,” defined as “a vehicle that produces no emissions of criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants, and greenhouse gases when stationary or operating, as determined by the state board”;
  • Missouri, which has an “alternative fuel decal fee,” defines “alternative fuel” as “electricity, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG or LP gas), compressed natural gas product, or a combination of liquefied petroleum gas and a compressed natural gas or electricity product used in an internal combustion engine or motor to propel any form of vehicle, machine, or mechanical contrivance”;
  • Nebraska law states, “Alternative fuel includes electricity, solar power, and any other source of energy not otherwise taxed under the motor fuel laws which is used to power a motor vehicle”; and
  • Virginia grants authority to its Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles to determine “a rate equivalent to that levied on gasoline and gasohol on all other alternative fuel used to operate a highway vehicle.” “Alternative fuel” is a “combustible gas, liquid or other energy source that can be used to generate power to operate a highway vehicle and that is neither a motor fuel nor electricity used to recharge an electric motor vehicle or a hybrid electric motor vehicle.”

Statutes of Georgia, Missouri, and Nebraska define and use the term “alternative fuel” but then exclude fuels such as propane, natural gas, or compressed gases from fees listed above for EVs and hybrid vehicles.

1This memorandum updates a memorandum on this issue dated January 25, 2022.

2 https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/fossil-fuels/gas-and-oil/new-registrations-of-gasoline-vehicles-are-still-growing-despite-the-ev-push/#:~:text=The%20distribution%20of%20vehicles%20in,with%20just%201%20percent%20electric; https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=62924

3 “Special Registration Fees for Electric and Hybrid Vehicles,” November 27, 2024, https://www.ncsl.org/transportation/special-registration-fees-for-electric-and-hybrid-vehicles, accessed December 2024.

4 Utah’s EV fee is based on its maximum road usage charge.

5 Beginning on January 1, 2024, Utah’s additional EV fee for hybrid vehicles is to be annually adjusted according to the change in the Consumer Price Index. Utah 2022 SB 51 changed fees for hybrid vehicles to $15 and $40 (plug-in hybrid), but that increase is not reflected in the Utah Code as published on its legislature’s website.

Statutes and Additional Sources

AlabamaAla. Code § 40-12-242
ArkansasA.C.A. §§ 27-14-601, 27-14-614
CaliforniaCal.Vehicle Code §§ 9250.6, 9250.8
ColoradoC.R.S.A. §§ 42-1-102, 42-3-304, 42-3-306; https://dmv.colorado.gov/state-dmv-fees, Sustainability Of The Transportation System Act Fees
GeorgiaGa. Code Ann., §§ 40-2-151, 40-2-86.1
HawaiiHRS §§ 249-31, 249-36; https://www.hawaiicounty.gov/departments/finance/vehicle-registration-licensing/motor-vehicles-fee-information
IdahoI.C. §§ 49-402, 49-457
Illinois625 ILCS 5/3-805, 5/3-806, 5/1-217
IndianaIC 9-18.1-5-2, 9-18.1-5-12, 6-6-1.6-2, 6-6-1.6-3
IowaI.C.A. §§ 321.109, 321.116
KansasKSA 8-143, 8-145
KentuckyKRS §§ 138.475, 138.477, 186.050
LouisianaLSA-R.S. 32:461, 47:463
MarylandMD Code, Transportation, § 13-956, 13-912, 13-954
MichiganM.C.L.A. 257.801; https://www.michigan.gov/taxes/business-taxes/motor-fuel/current-tax-rates-for-motor-fuel-and-alternative-fuel
MinnesotaM.S.A. §§ 168.013, 169.011
MississippiMiss. Code Ann. §§ 27-19-21, 27-19-23
MissouriV.A.M.S. 138.477, 142.869, 301.055; https://dor.mo.gov/motor-vehicle/fuel-decals.html
MontanaMCA 61-3-572
NebraskaNeb.Rev.St. §§ 60-3,143, 60-3,190, 60-3,191
New HampshireN.H. Rev. Stat. § 261:141-C
New JerseyN.J.S.A. 39:3-8.5
North CarolinaN.C.G.S.A. § 20-87
North DakotaNDCC, 39-04-19, 39-04-19.2
OhioR.C. § 4503.10; https://www.bmv.ohio.gov/doc-fees.aspx
Oklahoma68 Okl.St.Ann. § 6511; 47 Okl.St.Ann. § 1132, 1132.7
OregonO.R.S. §§ 803.420, 803.422; https://www.oregon.gov/odot/dmv/pages/fees/vehicle.aspx
PennsylvaniaVehicle Code 75 P.a. C.S. §§ 1021912. 9024
South CarolinaCode 1976 §§ 56-3-645, 56-3-620
South DakotaSDCL §§ 32-5-6. 32-5-30, 32-5-188
TennesseeT. C. A. §§ 55-4-116, 55-4-111
TexasV.T.C.A., Transportation Code §§ 502.252, 502.360, 502.252
UtahU.C.A. 1953 §§ 41-1a-1201, 41-1a-1206, 72-1-213.1
Vermont23 V.S.A. § 361
VirginiaVA Code Ann. §§ 46.2-770, 46.2-772, 46.2-774, 46.2-694; 58.1-2201, 58.1-2249; https://www.dmv.virginia.gov/vehicles/registration
WashingtonRCWA 46.17.323, 46.17.324, 46.17.350
West VirginiaW. Va. Code, §§ 17A-10-3c, 17A-10-3
WisconsinW.S.A. 341.25
WyomingW.S.1977 §§ 31-3-101, 31-3-102
All cited statutes and websites were accessed in December 2024, January 2025, or both.

Download a PDF of this report here.

Committee Reports to the 2025 Kansas Legislature

Committee Reports from the 2024 Interim can be found here. Click the Committee’s link to download a PDF of the individual report.

Committee Reports from the first Publication:

Committee Reports from the Supplement:

Briefing Book 2025

This publication contains briefs on timely topics that may be relevant during the current Legislative Session. The design is intended to provide a concise and useful resource for legislators. Articles have a standard length of two pages to efficiently convey the most important points about each topic, and graphics are included to illustrate large amounts of data in a concise format. The goal of this publication is to provide articles that are compact, easy to read, and relevant to even the most veteran lawmakers as a new session begins in the Statehouse.

Previous Briefing Book articles and more in-depth resources and memoranda continue to be updated with the latest information and are available on the Kansas Legislative Research Department website at klrd.gov.

Cover: “Flint Hill Farm” by Leo Courtney, about 1925. Courtesy Wichita Art Museum, Museum purchase from the Estate of Cleo B. Murney.

Contents:

Agriculture and Natural Resources
Farm to Food Bank Projects

Commerce, Labor, and Economic Development
Kansas Businesses: Jobs for Kansans

Education
Community Eligibility for Free Lunch
Kansas School Finance System Overview
National Trends in College Admissions
Open Enrollment
School Building Disposal
Student Loans and Financial Aid

Elections, Ethics, and Local Government
Home Rule
Political Committee Major Purpose Test
Recall of Local Elected Officials
Revenue Neutral Process
Voter Registration Qualifications
Voter Roll and Poll Book Maintenance

Federal and State Affairs
Article V Convention (Convention of States)
Characterization of Military Service Upon Discharge
Kansas National Guard and the Texas Border
Medical Marijuana Update
Review of Recent Abortion Court Cases

Financial Institutions and Insurance
Definition of Money and Money Transmitters
Hospital Price Transparency
Prior Authorization

Health and Social Services
Expedited Partner Therapy
Federal 340B Drug Pricing Program
Foster Care Update
Long-term Care Facilities Minimum Staffing Standards
Overview of Medical Assistance Programs
Update on the Community Support Waiver
Updated Child Care Regulations

Infrastructure and Security
Grid Security
Kansas Cybersecurity Update
Passenger Rail in Kansas

Judiciary, Corrections, and Juvenile Justice
Hutchinson Correctional Facility Capital Improvement Projects
Kansas Law Enforcement Fentanyl Response
SCOTUS 2023 Term Review and October 2024 Term Preview

State Budget
Introduction to the State Budget Process
KPERS Tier 3

Taxation
Approaches to Property Tax Limits
Disabled Veterans Property Tax Relief
Residential Property Tax Relief Programs

Utilities and Energy
Overview of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act

Printable PDF of the 2025 Briefing Book

Farm to Food Bank Projects

What is a Food Bank?

A food bank is a nonprofit, charitable organization that stocks and stores food that includes basic provisions and non-perishable items. This food is then distributed to food pantries, where the items are provided to individuals who are in need or are unable to purchase food. Food banks are an integral part of states’ food emergency services, which help distribute food during times of disasters.

In Kansas, there are three major food banks:

  • Kansas Food Bank;
  • Harvesters—The Community Food Network; and
  • Second Harvest of Greater St. Joseph.

These organizations work with more than 550 charitable food pantries throughout the state to distribute food products to those in need.

What is a Farm to Food Bank Project?

Farm to Food Bank Projects are defined in federal regulation (7 CFR 251.10(j)) as “the harvesting, processing, packaging, or transportation of unharvested, unprocessed, or unpackaged commodities donated by agricultural producers, processors, or distributors for use by emergency feeding organizations (EFOs).” These projects coordinate a logistical supply chain for local food producers to sell or donate their produce to food banks so that food banks can provide fresh produce to those in need, along with the traditional non-perishable items.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the purposes of Farm to Food Bank Projects must be:

  • Reducing food waste at the agricultural production, processing, or distribution level through the donation of food;
  • Providing food for individuals in need; and
  • Building relationships between agricultural producers, processors, and distributors and EFOs.
Map of Food Bank coverage in Kansas.
Data via https://kansasfoodsource.org/

Farm to Food Bank Projects in Kansas

In 2022, the Kansas Department of Agriculture (KDA) was awarded a $2.5 million cooperative agreement under the USDA Marketing Service’s Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) Program to fund and organize a Farm to Food Bank Project. The KDA partnered with the three major Kansas food banks to distribute fresh produce to food pantries to provide to the underserved and those in need.

According to the KDA, $2.3 million worth of local food was provided to 365 local pantries and mobile sites serving 187 cities across 98 counties in the first year of the program. In 2023, the KDA was awarded an additional $2.5 million to continue the LFPA Program through 2024 or until the funds were spent.

2024 HB 2564

During the 2024 Legislative Session, HB 2564 was introduced in the House Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources. The bill would have established the LFPA Program in statute to expand it beyond the current duration of the federal grant program. The House Committee added a sunset date of July 1, 2025, for the program. The KDA noted the bill would have increased expenditures from the State General Fund by $1.0 million, which would fund state grants to eligible organizations. After the House Committee recommended the bill be passed, as amended, the bill died on the House Calendar.

For more information, please contact:

Walter Schmidt
Research Analyst

Elaina Rudder
Senior Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
(785) 296-3181
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov