Introduction to the State Budget Process

In Kansas, the fiscal year (FY) begins on July 1 of each year. The State of Kansas uses an executive budget in that the budgetary recommendations of the Governor are embodied in appropriation bills, which are introduced, considered, and amended by the Legislature.

Interim

Most state agencies are required by law to submit budget requests no later than October 1. Customarily, the deadline specified by the Director of the Budget is September 15. Agency budget requests are submitted to the Division of the Budget and the Kansas Legislative Research Department (KLRD) at the same time.

KSA 75-3717(f) requires select agencies, of a primarily regulatory nature, to submit a budget request for one year in addition to the current and budget year. These are known as the Biennial Budgets.

The Director of the Budget, an appointee of the Governor, is directed by law to review the detailed requests submitted by the various state agencies and to make initial recommendations that are transmitted to agencies in November. An agency is then authorized to appeal those initial recommendations to the Governor. By law, Judicial Branch budgets are exempt from review by the Director. By practice, Legislative Branch budgets are not reviewed.

Legislative Session

After reviewing agency appeals, the Governor makes budgetary recommendations in The Governor’s Budget Report. This report is provided to the Legislature in January at the beginning of the legislative session.

KLRD prepares a Budget Analysis describing agency budgets and comparing changes between the agency’s request, what the previous Legislature approved, and what The Governor’s Budget Report includes. This Budget Analysis is typically published approximately three weeks after the Director submits The Governor’s Budget Report.

Identical appropriation bills reflecting the Governor’s recommendation are introduced in both chambers. Agency budgets receive simultaneous consideration by the House Committee on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on Ways and Means.

Consideration by the First Chamber and Second Chamber

The chairpersons of the House Committee on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on Ways and Means appoint budget committees (House) or subcommittees (Senate) to consider appropriations for various agencies. In recent years, the Senate Committee on Ways and Means has assigned consideration of budgets to Senate policy committees.

After reviewing these bills, budget committees and subcommittees draft reports detailing the amendments supported by the budget committee or subcommittee. Once the report is prepared, it is presented to the corresponding full committee. The full committee may further amend the recommendations or it may adopt the report as submitted. The recommendations of the committee are considered by the full chamber, which also may adjust (through floor amendments) or adopt the recommendations.

Conference Committee Action

After consideration of an appropriation bill by the second chamber, the bill typically goes to a conference committee to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions.

Omnibus Appropriations Bill

The Legislature typically adjourns its regular session in early April, then returns for a wrap-up session roughly 21/2 weeks following the first adjournment. During the wrap-up session, the Legislature takes action on a number of items of unfinished business, including the Omnibus Appropriations Bill. The Omnibus Appropriations Bill is designed to make technical adjustments to the appropriation bills passed earlier in the legislative session and to address the fiscal impact of legislation passed during the session. The Omnibus Appropriations Bill is usually one of the last bills passed each session.

Consensus Revenue Estimating Process

Since 1974, a consensus approach, involving the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch, and three consulting economists (Currently contracted from the University of Kansas, Kansas State University, and Wichita State University), has been utilized for estimating revenue estimates to the State General Fund (SGF).

These consensus revenue estimates are used by both the Governor and the Legislature to determine funding available for budget requests. The law requires that on or before December 4 and April 20 of each year, the Director of the Budget and the Director of Legislative Research prepare a joint estimate of revenue to the SGF for current and ensuing fiscal years.

The spring estimate is typically presented to a joint meeting of the House Committee on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on Ways and Means, which use those projections to determine appropriate adjustments to make in the Omnibus Appropriations Bill.

Budget Stabilization Fund

The Legislative Budget Committee is charged with developing and recommending a method to fund the Budget Stabilization Fund based on a review of criteria outlined in statute. In FY 2025, no additional transfers will be made to the Budget Stabilization Fund except interest revenue on the fund balance.

In FY 2025, the balance of the fund exceeds $1.8 billion.

KLRD Budget Publications

For more information on the State budget, find the following budget publications and resources on KLRD website:

For more information, contact:

Dylan Dear
Assistant Director for Fiscal Affairs

Steven Wu
Managing Fiscal Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

KPERS Tier 3

Created in 1961, the primary purpose of the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS or Retirement System) is to accumulate sufficient resources to pay benefits to retired state workers statutorily entitled to those benefits. As of December 2023, KPERS manages approximately $26.41 billion on a market value basis and $27.58 billion in actuarially valued assets.

Membership in the original retirement plan, now referred to KPERS Tier 1 (Tier 1), was offered to state and local public employees qualified under the new law and whose participating employers chose to affiliate with KPERS. In 2007, KPERS Tier 2 (Tier 2) was created for state, school, and local public employees becoming members on and after July 1, 2009.

In response to the 2008 recession and a 2011 study commission, the 2012 Legislature created KPERS Tier 3 (Tier 3), a cash balance plan for members employed on or after January 1, 2015.

KPERS Tier 3 Plan Design

The Tier 3 cash balance plan is similar to defined benefit plans—like Tiers 1 and 2—with characteristics of defined contribution plans—like 401(k) or 403(b) plans.

Similar to defined contribution plans, members have an account balance for employee contributions and employer credits. These accounts are notational (that is, all assets remain in the KPERS Trust Fund), and risks are shared between employer and employee.
Similar to defined benefit plans, retirement benefits are paid for life, and notational accounts are guaranteed a minimum interest crediting rate. Additionally, assets are pooled, and employer contributions are determined by an annual actuarial valuation.

KPERS State School Active Members
KPERS Local Active Members

Employee Membership

Membership is mandatory for all employees in covered positions, other than elected officials. As of December 2023, Tier 3 constitutes the largest share of members among KPERS plans, with 57,209 active State/School members and 22,657 active Local members.

Retirement Eligibility

Members are eligible for normal retirement at age 65 with 5 years of service or age 60 with 30 years of service. Since 2015, the Tier 3 plan serves as the primary retirement plan for new KPERS members.

Members are eligible for early retirement at age 55 with 10 years of service. However, because of Tier 3’s design as a cash balance plan, early retirement benefits are based on the account balance and annuity factor at retirement age.

Vesting Requirements

Vesting (the period of employment necessary for benefits to accrue) occurs at five years of service. If termination of employment occurs before vesting, interest would be paid for the first two years if employee contributions are not withdrawn. Conversely, if termination occurs after vesting, members have the option to leave contributions and draw retirement benefits when eligible or withdraw employee contributions and interest but forfeit all employer credits and service.

Retirement Benefits

By default, retirement distribution occurs as a single life with 10-year certain annuity. Differing from Tier 1 and Tier 2 plan designs, the Tier 3 plan is based on the member’s contributions and retirement credits earned from the employer, which are tracked throughout the member’s career. Interest is applied to the two accounts, and the benefit is based on the total account balance at retirement and has nothing to do with the number of years worked or finalized average salary.

The two components of interest credited under the cash balance plan are the guaranteed portion and the dividend. The guaranteed interest credit rate on the member and employer accounts is 4.0 percent, and the discretionary dividend credit is a dividend design (KSA 74-49,3061) equal to 75.0 percent of the five-year average net compound rate of return above 6.0 percent, as determined by the KPERS Board for the calendar year and the four preceding years.

Other Tier 3 benefits include the following:

  • Withdrawal Benefit. Members who terminate employment may withdraw contributions with interest after the last day on the employer’s payroll;
  • Disability Benefit. Tier 3 members who become disabled will have their accounts credited with employee contributions, employer retirement credits, interest credits, and dividends for the entire period of disability, but no later than the normal retirement age;
  • Post-retirement Benefit. Tier 3 has a self-funded cost-of-living adjustment of 1.0 or 2.0 percent, but that benefit is funded by the member through an actuarial reduction to the member’s lifetime benefit;
  • Death Benefit. If a vested Tier 3 member dies before attaining normal retirement age and has a spouse named as a primary beneficiary, that member’s retirement benefit would be distributed to the spouse when eligible; and
  • Post-retirement Death. A lump sump amount of $4,000 is made payable to the member’s beneficiary.

Employee Contributions

Members contribute 6.0 percent of pre-tax compensation, and contributions vest immediately. Interest is credited quarterly.

Employer Contributions

Employers contribute 3.0 percent for less than 5 years of service; 4.0 percent for at least 5 but less than 12 years of service; 5.0 percent for at least 12 but less than 24 years of service; and 6.0 percent for 24 or more years of service. Employer contributions are 12.54 percent in FY 2025 and 12.68 percent for FY 2026.

For more information, contact:

Steven Wu
Managing Fiscal Analyst

Dylan Dear
Assistant Director for Fiscal Affairs

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Approaches to Property Tax Limits

Property tax relief is commonly sought through targeted policies intended to reduce the tax burden for individual taxpayers, such as exemptions for fixed- or lower-income individuals. Other policies aim to provide more broad-based property tax relief by limiting the growth of the components used to determine the amount of tax paid. Approaches to tax relief that fall under the latter are the subject of this article.

Ad Valorem Taxation of Real Property in Kansas

In Kansas, real property—which includes real estate and associated property rights—is subject to ad valorem (according to value) property tax as a source of revenue for county and local governments. The tax to be assessed in a given year is determined by multiplying together the values of three components, as follows:

  • The value of the property as determined by each county appraiser each year according to constitutional and statutory requirements;
  • An assessment ratio, as defined by the Kansas Constitution, according to use classification; and
  • A mill levy rate (or millage rate) determined by dividing the total amount of revenue to be levied by the total value of property to be taxed within the jurisdiction.

Approaches to Property Tax Limits

Policy approaches that attempt to broadly limit property tax growth include levy limits, rate limits, and assessment limits:

  • Levy limits (or revenue limits) limit the amount that total property tax collections made by a taxing jurisdiction may increase from one year to the next;
  • Rate limits restrict growth of millage rates that taxing jurisdictions can set and may be applied by setting an absolute maximum rate or by limiting the relative amount that rates may grow from one year to the next; and
  • Assessment limits restrict the amount that a property’s valuation may increase from one year to the next.

Rate and levy limits often have exemptions that enable the limits to be exceeded under certain conditions, such as when authorized by voter approval or when certain conditions of the purpose for revenue increases are met.

Among states that utilize assessment limits, a common exception is that the limitation does not apply in years where certain events transpire, such as improvement or sale of the property, among others.

Approaches to Property Tax Limits in Kansas

Kansas does not currently impose direct limitations on levies, mill rates, or valuation increases; however, Kansas has had both levy limits and rate limits throughout much of its history.

From 1908 until 1933, statute provided that individual taxing entities could not increase amounts levied in any year by more than 2 percent, with a similar limitation placed on the aggregate amount levied by local governments beginning in 1933. In 1970, the Legislature enacted temporary limits on growth of operating budgets for all taxing entities (a form of levy limit), while making reforms to the earlier levy limits that persisted in largely the same form until the repeal of the so-called “tax lid” in 1999. For most of that period, tax levies could be increased beyond limits (up to a maximum rate increase) if approved by voters.

Legislation referred to as “truth in taxation” was adopted in 1999 that imposed a general limit on any levy increase from one year to the next without the adoption of a resolution or ordinance, unless the increase was attributable to new improvements to real property, increased personal property valuation, newly applicable taxing jurisdictions, or changes in the use of property.

A new form of the tax lid, adopted in 2015 and repealed in 2021 by the adoption of SB 13, generally limited increases in levy amounts to the rate of inflation unless approved by voters. Since that time, Kansas has applied a requirement that mill rates beyond what would generate the same amount of revenue as in the previous year (the “Revenue Neutral Rate”) require special notice and a public hearing afforded to taxpayers.

Recent Legislative Proposals

More recently, the Legislature has considered policies that would have imposed limits on valuation growth. 2023 SCR 1611 would have amended the Kansas Constitution to limit the annual growth of the valuation of a parcel of real property to 4 percent, except in years when certain events occur, including when new construction or improvements have been made to the property or when the title to the property is transferred, changed, or conveyed to another person. Similar approaches have been proposed in additional legislation, including 2024 SCR 1621 and the 2024 Special Session resolutions SCR 1603 and SCR 1604.

During the 2023 Interim, the 2023 Special Committee on Taxation considered property valuation issues, including those related to the subject matter of 2023 SCR 1611 and additional items. Among the recommendations made by the Committee was that the Legislature consider implementation of tax levy limitations or a possible hybrid of SCR 1611 and the limitation approach utilized in Florida, which imposes similar limitations but includes a component allowing taxpayers to retain a portion of their growth limitation benefit, even when changing residences.

For more information, contact:

Eric Adell
Senior Research Analyst

Edward Penner
Assistant Director for Research
Principal Economist

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Disabled Veterans Property Tax Relief

Disabled veterans are currently entitled to residential property tax relief measures in all 50 states; however, the qualifications and scope of relief vary greatly from state to state. Note: All provisions discussed in this article refer to the primary residence of a disabled veteran.

Veterans Administration Disability Ratings

Typically, state or local laws require a person to be designated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as having some sort of compensable service-connected disability. In other words, the disability must be connected to the person’s service in a branch of the U.S. military and must also meet the threshold for disability compensation. For veterans under the care of the VA, their service-connected disability or disabilities are assigned a rating, with 10 percent being the lowest rating. Disability ratings may then be combined up to a maximum total of 100 percent. For additional information on disability ratings and compensation, please visit the VA’s website.

State Qualifications—Disability Rating-only

In the majority of states, disabled veterans may receive a residential property tax benefit regardless of income or property valuation.

100 Percent Disability-only

A total of 27 states offer either a complete or partial exemption of residential property taxes for primary residences of veterans with a 100 percent disability rating-only.

Less than 100 Percent Disability

In 11 states, persons with less than a 100 percent disability rating may receive an exemption of a portion of the taxable value of their primary residence, resulting in a lower amount of residential property taxes due. In many of these states, the exemption is proportional to disability rating. The exemption threshold also varies greatly, with some states providing some benefit at 10 percent disability and others having minimum thresholds between 40 to 90 percent.

Other Qualifications and Specific Benefits

Delaware offers full exemption from school district residential property taxes for 100 percent disabled veterans. In Hawaii, county laws and ordinances govern residential property tax, with some counties granting a 100 percent exemption to certain disabled veterans, with a minimum tax due of $150 in each county. Idaho law provides a $1,500 credit toward residential property taxes for persons with a 100 percent disability rating. Missouri provides a 100 percent exemption for veterans who have a 100 percent disability rating and who were also a prisoner of war.

State Qualifications—Income or Valuation Threshold

In eight states, residential property tax benefits for disabled veterans are only extended to those who meet certain income thresholds or whose primary residence is valued under a certain amount for taxing purposes.

Disabled Veterans Property Tax Reduction or Exemption by State - Map chart

Current Kansas Benefits

The state Senior or Disabled Veteran program, enacted in 2022, is available to Kansas residents who, for the entire year:

  • Owned and occupied a home in Kansas;
  • Were 65 years or older or a disabled veteran with a 50 percent or greater permanent disability rating; and
  • Had a household income at or below the threshold for eligibility, which was $53,600 in 2023.

If the home’s value did not exceed $350,000 in their base year, the taxpayer can receive a refund in the amount of the difference between the current year and base year tax amount, with the base year being the first year the taxpayer was eligible for the program.

Veterans’ Valor Property Tax Relief Act—2024 HB 2096

HB 2096 (2024) would have enacted the Veterans’ Valor Property Tax Relief Act, which would have created a refundable income tax credit for veterans with a 100 percent permanent disability or unemployable rating by the VA. The credit would have refunded 75 percent of the property and ad valorem taxes paid on the residential property of such veteran. Taxpayers receiving the credit would have been prohibited from receiving certain other property tax relief credits and would not have been subject to income or valuation requirements. HB 2096 included other tax provisions and was vetoed by the Governor. The Legislature did not make a motion to override the veto.

For more information, contact:

Jordan Milholland
Managing Research Analyst

Molly Pratt
Fiscal Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Residential Property Tax Relief Programs

Kansas has had some form of property tax relief program for certain residential property since 1970, when the Homestead Property Tax Relief Act was enacted. Today, Kansas has three such programs, each differing in their recipients and benefits.

This article summarizes the key elements of Kansas’ Homestead Property Tax Refund Act, Selective Assistance for Effective Senior Relief (SAFESR) program, and a newer “tax freeze” benefit option.

Homestead Property Tax Refund Act

Kansas became the sixth state to adopt a property tax “circuit breaker” program in 1970 with the enactment of the Homestead Property Tax Refund Act.

This program provides a refund of a portion of property taxes paid, up to $700. The refund amount is determined using a sliding scale where participants with higher incomes receive a smaller percent and participants with lower incomes receive a greater percent.

Taxpayers with incomes below $6,000 are entitled to 100 percent of their property tax or the cap of $700, whichever is lower. For each $1,000 increase in the income amount, the benefit amount decreases by 4 percentage points to $16,000 and 60 percent, at which point the sliding scale adjusts to 5 percentage points for each $1,000 of income until leveling off at 5 percent for all eligible incomes over $26,000.

This program requires participants to have household incomes of $40,500 or less as of 2023 (the actual amount is annually indexed for inflation) and to meet at least one additional eligibility criteria for someone in the household:

  • Age 55 or above;
  • A dependent under the age of 18; or
  • Blind or otherwise disabled.

Selective Assistance for Effective Senior Relief

In 2008, Kansas enacted a simplified version of a circuit breaker program with a generally larger benefit and heightened eligibility thresholds.

This option required someone in the household to be age 65 or above and the household income to be equal to or less than 120 percent of the federal poverty level for a family of two people, which equaled $23,700 for 2023.

The benefit paid under this program is 75 percent of the total property tax paid, without the $700 limit applicable to the Homestead program, resulting in larger average refunds than the Homestead program but fewer eligible claimants.

“Tax Freeze” Option

In 2022, Kansas enacted a new approach to determining the amount of property tax relief afforded to eligible beneficiaries.

This option, which attempts to “freeze” taxpayers’ bills at the amount for the year in which they first became eligible for the program, grants a benefit that is the difference between the current year’s tax and the tax amount for the base year. Accordingly, the size of the benefit is typically linked to the length of time the taxpayer has been eligible for the program.

The base year is 2021 or the first year the taxpayer meets the eligibility criteria for the program, whichever is later.

The program requires participants to have household incomes of $53,600 or less, as of 2023 (actual amount indexed for inflation), and to be either age 65 or above or a disabled veteran with a permanent disability rating of at least 50 percent.

Provisions Applicable to Multiple Programs

Each program contains a provision prohibiting beneficiaries under the program from being eligible for either of the other two programs, meaning a taxpayer may only receive benefits under one program per year. However, taxpayers are able to participate in different programs in different years.

For all programs, household income is defined more broadly than taxable income is defined for individual income tax purposes, specifically including 50 percent of Social Security benefits, regardless of whether they are subject to tax and other income categories.

All programs generally require the claimant to be a resident of Kansas for the entire year and to own their home.

Each program has a residential valuation limitation of $350,000. However, this limitation only applies to the base year for the tax freeze option.

All programs provide an option for the refund amount to be automatically applied to the taxpayer’s property tax bill for the following year, thereby directly lessening the amount of property tax required to be paid in all years other than the first year of participation in the program.

For more information, contact:

Edward Penner
Assistant Director for Research
Principal Economist

Eric Adell
Senior Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Overview of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act

The federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), was signed into law on November 15, 2021. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the BIL authorized an investment of $1.2 trillion for transportation and infrastructure spending across the United States, with $550.0 billion of that amount dedicated to “new” investments and projects from federal fiscal years 2022 to 2026.

The BIL also makes new investments in water infrastructure, resilience, and broadband.

Inflation Reduction Act

The federal Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was signed into law on August 16, 2022, with the goal of a federal government budget deficit reduction, prescription drug pricing reform, and energy security. The Congressional Budget Office estimates IRA spending and tax breaks to total $485.0 billion from 2022 to 2031. Of that amount, $386.0 billion is for energy and climate and $98.0 billion is for health care.

This article will focus on federal BIL and IRA funds received by the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) for energy and environmental remediation programs.

Kansas Corporation Commission Programs

The KCC indicates having received, or estimates to receive, new funding or additional funding for four program areas through the BIL and two program areas through the IRA.

Kansas BIL Programs

A description of each program supported by the BIL and estimated funding in Kansas is discussed below.

Grid Resilience Formula Grant

The objective of the Grid Resilience Formula Grant program is to improve electricity delivery and reliability by maintaining and investing in critical generation facilities to ensure resource adequacy and improving transmission and distribution systems to ensure all communities have access to reliable, affordable electricity.

The KCC indicates that $13.3 million was received in FY 2024 and estimates receiving an additional $6.5 million for FY 2025.

Energy Efficiency and Conservation

The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant program provides financial and technical assistance to assist state and local governments in creating and implementing a variety of energy efficiency and conservation projects.

Federal funding for this program was originally issued as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and is now being made available under the BIL.

The KCC indicates that $1.9 million was received in FY 2024 and estimates receiving no additional funding for FY 2025.

Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund

The Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund is designed to increase market transformation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies through policies, strategies, and public-private partnerships. The Fund also facilitates state-based activities, such as:

The KCC indicates that no funding was received in FY 2024 and estimates receiving $6.7 million for FY 2025.

Orphaned Well Program

The objective of the Orphaned Well Program is to reduce methane and other greenhouse gas emissions, assist with cleanup of water contamination, restore native habitat, create jobs, and benefit disproportionately impacted communities through grants to plug, remediate, and reclaim orphaned oil and gas well sites.

The KCC indicates that $25.0 million has been received so far through phase one of the initiative and estimates an additional $33.0 million in federal funding for phase two of the initiative.

Kansas IRA Programs

The IRA supports two Home Energy Rebates programs in Kansas. These programs allow the Kansas Energy Office to offer discounts to single-family and multi-family households for efficiency upgrades on items such as home appliances and equipment.

High-efficiency Electric Home Rebates

For High-efficiency Electric Home Rebates, also known as Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates, the KCC indicates that $1.3 million was received in FY 2024 and estimates receiving $51.3 million for FY 2025.

Home Energy Efficiency Rebates

For Home Energy Efficiency Rebates, the KCC indicates that $1.3 million was received in FY 2024 and estimates receiving $51.5 million for FY 2025.

For more information, contact:

Luke Drury
Senior Fiscal Analyst

Kate Smeltzer
Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Fall 2024 Education Consensus Summary

This document shows the current estimate for each of the major State Aid categories for K-12 education: State Foundation Aid; Supplemental State Aid; Special Education State Aid; Capital Outlay State Aid; Capital Improvement State Aid; and KPERS contributions for USDs and non-USDs (community colleges, technical colleges, and interlocals). The document also provides a comparison between the current estimate and the amount approved by the 2024 Kansas Legislature.

Kansas School Finance System Memo, 2017-2024

This memorandum describes the current school finance system operating in Kansas, including the Kansas School Equity and Enhancement Act (KSEEA), and other school finance laws since 2017. This memorandum details the following:

  • Calculation of State Foundation Aid, including the various weightings used to determine a school district’s weighted enrollment;
  • The local option budget (LOB), including the state equalization aid (Supplemental State Aid);
  • Capital Outlay State Aid;
  • Capital Improvement State Aid;
  • Special Education State Aid; and
  • Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) employer contributions.

Unless necessary to provide context, the history of changes to the Kansas school finance system is not discussed. The history of the School District Finance and Quality Performance Act (SDFQPA) and the Classroom Learning Assuring Student Success Act (CLASS Act) are covered in a separate memorandum, available upon request.

Fall 2024 Human Services Caseloads Memo

The Division of the Budget, Department for Children and Families (DCF), Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), Department for Aging and Disability Services (KDADS), and the Legislative Research Department (Consensus Group) met on November 8, 2024, to revise the estimates for human services consensus caseload expenditures for FY 2025 and to develop estimates for FY 2026. The caseload estimates include expenditures for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the Reintegration/Foster Care Contracts, KanCare Regular Medical Assistance, and KDADS Non-KanCare. A chart summarizing the estimates for FY 2025 and FY 2026 is included at the end of this memorandum.

Consensus Revenue Estimates Long Memo, November 2024

Estimates for the State General Fund (SGF) are developed using a consensus process that involves the Legislative Research Department, Division of the Budget, Department of Revenue, and consulting economists from state universities. This estimate is the base from which the Governor and the Legislature build the annual budget. The Consensus Group met on November 15, 2024, to revise the estimates for fiscal year (FY) 2025 and to make its initial forecast for FY 2026. For FY 2025, the previous estimates were made in April 2024 and subsequently adjusted for legislation enacted during the veto session and the 2024 Special Session.

The overall estimate for FY 2025 was decreased by $59.8 million. Of this amount, the estimate for total taxes was decreased by $72.2 million, while the estimate for other revenues was increased by $12.4 million.

Table 1 compares the revised estimates for FY 2025 and the initial estimates for FY 2026 with actual receipts from FY 2024. Table 2 shows the changes to the previous FY 2025 estimate.