Long-term Care Facilities Minimum Staffing

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published a final rule creating new requirements for staffing levels in CMS-certified long-term care facilities on May 10, 2024, in the Federal Register, effective June 21, 2024. The final rule makes the following changes:

  • Minimum staffing hours. Facilities must provide a minimum of 3.48 hours per resident day of direct nursing care, of which at least 0.55 hours per resident day must be by registered nurses (RNs) and 2.45 hours per resident day must be made by nurse aides (NAs). The remaining 0.48 hours per resident day may be provided by any combination of nurse staff, including RNs, NAs, Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs), and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs);
  • RN on-site requirement. Facilities must have at least one RN on-site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (24/7) and available to provide direct resident care. The on-site RN may be the Director of Nursing (DON). However, the DON must be available to provide direct resident care; and
  • Facility assessment requirements. Certain changes to the facility assessment include the following:
    • Require evidence-based methods when planning care for residents, including those residents with behavioral health needs;
    • Assess specific needs of each resident and adjust care based on the assessed needs in the resident population;
    • Consider input from nursing home leadership, management, direct care staff, residents, and family members; and
    • Develop a staffing plan to maximize recruitment and retention of staff.

Hardship Exemptions

Facilities may qualify for a temporary hardship exemption if the facility meets all of the following requirements based on its geographic area:

  • Exemption from 3.48 hours per resident day requirement. The facility must demonstrate that the combined licensed nurse—which includes RNs, LVNs, and LPNs—and nurse-aide-to-population ratio is a minimum of 20 percent below the national average;
  • Exemption from 0.55 RN hours per resident day requirement, and exemption of 8 hours per day from the RN on-site 24/7 requirement. The facility must demonstrate the RN-to-population ratio is a minimum of 20 percent below the national average; and
  • Exemption from 2.45 nurse aide hours per resident day requirement. The facility must demonstrate the NA-to-population ratio is a minimum of 20 percent below the national average.

Facilities receiving an exemption must post notice in the facility, notify residents, and notify the State’s Long-term Care Ombudsman.

Implementation

The final rule has a different timeline based upon facility geographic classification as follows:

Non-rural facilities:

  • By August 8, 2024, facilities must have complied with the facility assessment requirements;
  • By May 11, 2026, facilities must comply with the requirement to have an RN on-site 24/7 and with the 3.48 hours per resident day total nurse staffing requirement; and
  • By May 10, 2027, facilities must comply with the minimum staffing requirement of 0.55 and 2.45 hours per resident day for RNs and NAs.

Rural facilities: Note: “Rural facilities” are defined as facilities that are not part of a metropolitan statistical area, which is defined by the federal Office of Management and Budget as having at least one urbanized area with a minimum population of 50,000.

  • By August 8, 2024, facilities must have complied with the facility assessment requirements;
  • By May 10, 2027, facilities must comply with the requirement to have an RN on-site 24/7 and with the 3.48 hours per resident day total nurse staffing requirement; and
  • By May 10, 2029, facilities must comply with the minimum staffing requirement of 0.55 and 2.45 hours per resident day for RNs and NAs.

For more information, contact:

Dayton LaMunyon
Senior Fiscal Analyst

Elizabeth Cohn
Senior Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Overview of Medical Assistance Programs

Medical Assistance Programs

The State of Kansas offers medical assistance to eligible Kansans through three major programs.

Medicaid. Medicaid is part of KanCare, the state’s managed care program, and covers Kansans with limited income who meet program eligibility criteria in the following groups: pregnant women, children up to age 19, adult caretakers of children, persons who have aged out of foster care, individuals with disabilities, and senior citizens.

Children’s Health Insurance Plan (CHIP). CHIP is also part of KanCare and provides coverage to uninsured children up to age 19 who do not qualify for Medicaid.

MediKan. MediKan is a fully state-funded program that provides time-limited coverage to persons who are applying for Social Security disability benefits.

KanCare

KanCare is the State of Kansas’ managed care program and utilizes a variety of special programs to administer Medicaid. KanCare services are provided by contracted Managed Care Organizations (MCOs).

The first MCO contracts for KanCare began in January 2013 and ended December 31, 2018. The second set of MCO contracts, often referred to as KanCare 2.0, began January 1, 2019, and will end December 31, 2024. The State entered its third contract with MCOs (KanCare 3.0) in 2024. These contracts will begin January 1, 2025.

Eligibility

All persons who receive KanCare must reside in Kansas and either be a U.S. citizen or a non-citizen who meets a qualifying status as determined by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Individuals must also meet medical, age, and financial eligibility requirements. KanCare eligibility is determined on an annual basis.

Providers

The MCOs under KanCare 2.0 are Sunflower Health Plan (Sunflower), UnitedHealthcare Community Plan of Kansas (UHC), and Aetna Better Health of Kansas (Aetna).
Beginning January 1, 2025, the MCOs for KanCare 3.0 will be two incumbents, Sunflower and UHC, and a new MCO, Healthy Blue (Community Care Health Plan of Kansas and Healthy Blue).

KanCare 3.0 Procurement Process

The request for proposal (RFP) was written over many months through a joint agency effort that included the Kansas Department of Administration (DOA), Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), and Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services (KDADS). The KanCare 3.0 RFP was released by DOA in October 2023, and a contract was announced in May 2024. The minimum contract term will be January 1, 2025, to December 30, 2027, with an option for the State to renew for two one-year terms. If the option to renew is authorized, the contracts could extend through December 30, 2029, at the latest.

Payment

KDHE pays each MCO a set per-member, per-month rate as specified in their contracts. This capitated rate is calculated each month and is based on the number of individuals enrolled in each eligibility category that month and the anticipated services they will require, including pharmaceuticals.

When establishing the rates at which MCOs are paid, KDHE must comply with federal regulations requiring such rates be developed in accordance with accepted actuarial practices and certified by qualified actuaries. Rates must be high enough to attract a provider base that can meet contractual requirements for availability and accessibility of services. KDHE’s actuaries review the MCO rates on a regular basis and adjust rates as needed to ensure they remain actuarially sound.

Agency responsibilities

KDHE

The State Medicaid Director is housed within KDHE, the primary agency involved in the management of KanCare. KDHE is responsible for MCO contract oversight, claims management, and ensuring that KanCare 3.0 meets all standards as required by the federal government. The federal partner for KanCare is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS is the federal agency that provides health coverage to more than 160 million individuals through Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and the Health Insurance Marketplace.

KDADS

A specialized component of KanCare is the Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) waivers, a system of community-based supports and services for persons in Kansas with disabilities, administered by KDADS. The HCBS provider network includes a variety of not-for-profit and for-profit organizations, as well as governmental entities. These services are provided through seven HCBS waiver programs.

KanCare 3.0 Improvements

KDHE and KDADS have jointly announced several key improvements included in the KanCare 3.0 MCO contracts, including:

  • Educating, engaging, incentivizing, and empowering members to achieve personally defined health goals;
  • Enhancing care coordination to ensure timely access to needed services, continuity of care, successful care transitions, and improved member outcomes;
  • Improving prenatal and postpartum care, including requirements for maternity care coordination;
  • Increasing the recruitment and retention of providers; and
  • Expanding access to services in rural and frontier areas.

Open Enrollment

Members of KanCare will have two open enrollment periods in 2024 and 2025. As there is a new MCO, a minimum 60-day open enrollment period will be held in 2024. In addition, the regularly scheduled 90-day open enrollment period will occur between January 1, 2025, and March 31, 2025.

For more information, contact:

Elizabeth Cohn
Senior Research Analyst

Megan Leopold
Managing Fiscal Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Update on the Community Support Waiver 2025

Community Support Waiver Services

The 2022 Special Committee on Intellectual and Developmental Disability Waiver Modernization (Committee) recommended the development of a Home and Community Based Services Medicaid Community Support Waiver (CSW) to serve youth and adults with intellectual and developmental disability (I/DD) who need less-intensive services and supports than those provided on the existing comprehensive I/DD Waiver.

The services provided would be tailored to meet individual needs and would not include day or residential services. The Committee envisioned the CSW as a means to reduce the waiting list for individuals seeking I/DD Waiver services. The Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services (KDADS) anticipates current I/DD Waiver participants not using day or residential supports may choose to transfer to the CSW to allow them to take advantage of the flexibility to tailor goods and services to their individual needs and preferences.

Services discussed by the Committee for inclusion in the CSW are:

  • Transportation to and from work;
  • Staff support with employment;
  • Individual budget authority;
  • Individualized personal care services to assist with activities of daily living;
  • Respite services for families caring for a family member on the waiver;
  • Various therapy services;
  • Assistive technology to increase a person’s independence;
  • Minimal staff supports to allow independent living in one’s own home or apartment;
  • Support and training for family and caregivers;
  • Financial management services and support brokers to assist with personal budget and expenditures; and
  • Benefits counseling provided by a navigator to assist the person and their family to understand KanCare.

Fiscal Impact Estimate

At the request of the Committee, KDADS estimated the fiscal impact for each service recommended for possible inclusion in the CSW. Because a CSW would offer a limited menu of services, its cost is anticipated to be less than the current I/DD waiver.
KDADS based its cost estimate on Missouri’s comparable CSW, with these considerations:

  • Annual per-person cap on services of $20,000 (Missouri’s waiver is capped at $28,000);
  • Cost match of approximately 60 percent federal funding and 40 percent State funding;
  • Range of participants from 3,600 to 7,461, which would be refined based on the findings of the Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities Waiting List Study;
  • Emphasis on supported employment, respite, training, and personal care options;
  • Increase in self-directed services; and
  • Phased rollout with assistance from community developmental disability organizations and other stakeholders to avoid overloading system capacity and ensure adequate service provision and correct waiver implementation.

Based on these considerations, KDADS estimates the cost of CSW implementation would range from $72.0 million all funds, including $29.0 million State General Fund (SGF), to $149.0 million all funds, including $40.0 million SGF.

Implementation Progress

KDADS has employed internal CSW staff, contracted with a third party to assist in writing the waiver application, and has convened a Technical Advisory Group made up of stakeholders that will meet monthly to advise the State on improvements to the I/DD system.

The anticipated CSW implementation timeline is:

  • August 2023: Approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to use Federal Medical Assistance Percentage funds to hire staff and a contractor for the CSW;
  • Remainder of 2023: Hire an on-board internal CSW staff and draft a request for proposal to contract for additional assistance in development and application of the CSW;
  • April to June 2024: Contractor will form and convene stakeholder groups to provide feedback to the State regarding services;
  • July 2024 to July 2025: Contractor will draft CSW and expand the provider network;
  • August 2025 to September 2025: Public comment period on the waiver application;
  • October 2025: Submit CSW application to CMS, anticipating approximately six months to review and approve the application; and
  • April 2026: Waiver approved by CMS.

KDADS estimates the earliest date for utilization of services through the CSW would be state fiscal year (FY) 2026. Upon approval, KDADS proposes adding 500 participants in the first year at a cost of $10.0 million all funds, including $4.0 million SGF. Each subsequent year, KDADS would add additional individuals based on provider capacity. The agency’s FY 2026 budget submission will include an enhancement request to fund a partial year’s cost to serve the first 500 individuals.

Updated Child Care Regulations

During the 2023 Interim, the Special Committee on Child Care Centers and Child Care Homes (Committee) met for two days to study and make recommendations regarding policy options for child care facilities, including day care regulation. Among the recommendations, the Committee requested the Legislative Coordinating Council compose a letter to the Office of the Attorney General to request that the proposed regulations from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) for child care centers and child care homes be expedited. The new rules and regulations regarding child care became effective on August 2, 2024. Selected revisions are highlighted below.

Staff-child Ratios

The new regulations update the staff-child ratios for licensees. Among the changes, “license capacity” is changed to “maximum group size” to reflect the maximum number of children allowed in a group changes depending on the ages of the children and the number of providers present. The changes also allow for some flexibility with infant child care slots, and providers who opt to care for an additional infant may adjust to do so. Additionally:

  • The infant age group was adjusted to 0 to 12 months rather than 0 to 18 months;
  • The maximum age of children is changed from age 11 to age 10; and
  • A slot for 5-to-10-year-old children was shifted to the 12-month-to-5-year age range to allow for another preschool age child in a center’s capacity.
Age of ChildrenMinimum Staff-to-child RatioMaximum Number of Children Per Unit
Infants*A. 1 to 3 or B. 1 to 4A. 9 or B. 8
Infants and other children under the age of 61 to 6 (including not more than 3 infants)12 (including not more than 6 infants)
Toddlers^1 to 612
Children at least 2 years of age but under the age of 31 to 714
Children at least 2.5 years of age but under school-age***1 to 1224
School-age1 to 1632
* Only one staff-child ratio may be used at any one time for each infant unit.
^ “Toddler” means a child who has learned to walk and who is between 12 and 30 months of age (KAR 28-4-420).
*** “School-age” means a child who will attain the age of eligibility to enter kindergarten [KSA 72-3118(c)] but who is not 16 years of age or older (KAR 28-4-420).

Professional Development Training

The updated regulations specify that provider training must be completed before the provider is given sole responsibility for the care and supervision of children. Health and safety training requirements were updated to expand required training topics to include the prevention of child maltreatment; cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development; approaches to learning; and medication administration.

Pediatric first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification requirements were updated to specify that certification must include a practical application component and be demonstrated in front of an instructor certified by a nationally recognized first aid and CPR training organization. At least one provider who has current certification in pediatric first aid and current certification in pediatric CPR must be present during operating hours.

Daily Care of Children

The new regulations specify storage and safe handling guidelines for breast milk provided for children in care. Accommodations must be provided to enable a parent to breastfeed their child.

Individuals who care for children are prohibited from giving any child any medications, herbal or folk remedies, or drugs to control or manage behavior, unless prescribed by a licensed physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse.

Licensees must also develop and implement a written plan for safe sleep practices for children in care who are napping or sleeping.

Parental Access

The new regulations add requirements regarding video cameras used for the purpose of monitoring children’s activities or to provide remote visual access to parents and legal guardians. All staff members must be informed if cameras are used in a facility, and the parent or legal guardian of each child in care must be informed in writing. The use of cameras is not allowed to replace any requirements for supervision of children in care. Licensees must also give the Secretary’s designee access to recordings and viewing privileges for the purpose of investigating compliance.

When leaving the premises of the licensed child care facility, written permission must be obtained from the parent or legal guardian of each child participating in the trip. Each child’s emergency medical treatment form and medical record must be accessible when participating in any off-premises trip or activity.

Safety and Emergency Procedures

The updated regulations provide more specificity regarding the types of emergency plans that licensees must develop. Emergency plans must include procedures for events including a fire, a weather-related event, a missing or runaway child, a chemical release, a utility failure, an intruder, an act of terrorism, a lockdown, and an unscheduled closing. Facilities must specify a designated shelter-in-place area, a designated off-premises relocation site, and evacuation routes for each area and for each site. Licensees must also record procedures to meet the needs of individual children, including those with allergies, chronic medical conditions, or special needs, and procedures for notifying parents and reuniting children and parents when necessary.

Licensees must review the emergency plan at least annually and update it as needed.
The updated regulations are available in their entirety at the KDHE website.

For more information, contact:

Leighann Thone
Senior Research Analyst

Elizabeth Cohn
Senior Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Grid Security

Protecting the bulk electric system (or “power grid”) from both physical and cyberattacks is known as “grid security.”

Risks and Threats

In 2023, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reported at least 175 instances of physical attacks or threats against critical grid infrastructure, including incidences of theft and vandalism. In 2024, Check Point Research documented 1,162 cyberattacks on utilities, a 70 percent increase compared with the same period in the prior year.

While few of these attacks have had an impact on the grid, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) reported that points of susceptibility continue to increase as the grid expands and incorporates new technologies—with the number of susceptible points increasing by approximately 60 per day. With these ever-increasing vulnerabilities, coupled with the outdated software that many utilities use, a coordinated attack could be devastating to the power grid and the essential services it supports.

The Grid. Image by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, via Wikipedia.

Regulating Authority

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 authorized the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to oversee the reliability of the power grid. FERC certified NERC as the nation’s electric reliability organization to develop and enforce reliability standards, subject to FERC approval. These standards are referred to as the Critical Infrastructure Protection standards.

Preparedness

The Electricity Subsector Coordinating Council (ESCC) is the liaison between the electric power industry and the federal government, and it is responsible for preparing for and responding to threats and disasters. Among other things, the ESCC manages a Cyber Mutual Assistance program to help utilities restore critical computer systems following significant cyber incidents.

The electric power industry employs a strategy called “defense-in-depth,” which focuses on preparation, prevention, response, and recovery for “all hazard” threats to electric grid operations. Aspects include emergency exercises, such as NERC’s biannual GridEx program. Utilities also share transformers and other equipment through programs like SPAREConnect, Spare Transformer Equipment Program, and Grid Assurance.

Recent Legislation

The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, now known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), provided $27.0 billion to the DOE to modernize the electrical grid and make it more resilient to extreme weather and resistant to cyberattacks. Under the BIL, the DOE created the Grid Deployment Office and established several grant programs, including the Rural And Municipal Utility Advances Cybersecurity Grant and Technical Assistance Program. The BIL also required states to submit revised state energy security plans by September 30, 2023.

In March 2022, the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (CIRCIA) was signed into law. CIRCIA requires covered critical infrastructure entities to report cyber incidents within 72 hours and ransomware payments within 24 hours to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

In Kansas statute, KSA 66-1234 through 66-1236 is known as the Kansas Energy Security Act. The Act became law in 2003 and deals only with recovery of security expenditures after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

For more information, contact:

Nicole Fielder
Research Analyst

Kate Smeltzer
Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Kansas Cybersecurity Update

From 2022 to 2023, ransomware attacks against cities, counties, and state agencies increased by 36 percent.

A ransomware attack is a type of malicious software (malware) that encrypts its files on a victim’s computer or network, rendering them inaccessible until a ransom is paid to the attacker.

Ransomware typically infiltrates a system through phishing emails (emails from a malicious actor that appear to be from a legitimate or trusted sender), malicious downloads, or vulnerabilities in software. After data encryption, the attacker presents a ransom note, usually demanding payment in cryptocurrency, which is digital currency that uses cryptography (encryption) to secure transactions, making it harder to trace. The note typically includes instructions on how to pay and may threaten to permanently delete the files if the ransom is not paid within a specified time frame.

Victims face the dilemma of paying the ransom, which does not guarantee data recovery, or attempting recovery through backups or cybersecurity measures, which can be complicated and costly.

Recent Kansas Incidents

In 2023 and 2024, entities in Kansas have been victims of multiple high-profile ransomware attacks. These incidents include:

  • The October 2023 attack on the Kansas Judicial Branch, shutting down online access to the court system for several months;
  • The May 2024 attack on the City of Wichita, disrupting city services and reverting to cash-only payments of city services; and
  • The September 2024 attack on Franklin County, exposing poll book records containing names, social security numbers, vaccination information, and insurance billing information of the county’s 30,000 residents.

The above list is not exhaustive, and multiple other towns, hospitals, colleges, and governmental entities have dealt with increasing cyber threats.

New Cybersecurity Initiatives

State officials and the Legislature, in cooperation with federal entities like the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), have been working to improve the security posture of the State for the last several years.

The most recent effort can be seen in the enactment of 2024 House Sub. for SB 291, which contains numerous provisions geared toward improving the State’s cybersecurity posture. Among these provisions is the requirement that the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) for each branch of government work with their respective agency heads to develop cybersecurity programs compliant with the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF) 2.0. These programs must be in place by July 1, 2028.

The NIST CSF was first established in 2014 and provided guidelines and best practices to manage and reduce cybersecurity risk for critical infrastructure. The standards were updated in February 2024 and expanded to be more applicable to governments, small businesses, and nonprofits.

The NIST CSF 2.0 includes the following six core functions:

  • Identify—understanding organizational assets, risks, and resources;
  • Protect—safeguarding critical assets and data from threats;
  • Detect—identifying potential cybersecurity events or incidents;
  • Respond—take action during or after a cybersecurity event;
  • Recover—restore capabilities and services after a cybersecurity event; and
  • Govern—establish and monitor policies, processes, and oversight to manage cybersecurity risks.

The goal of the core functions is to help organizations understand, assess, and prioritize cybersecurity risks, as well as communicate those risks with stakeholders and partners.

At the time of this publication, Kansas is the only state to adopt a requirement for NIST CSF 2.0 compliance. Federal agencies are the only other entities that require similar compliance. Other entities adopt the NIST CSF 2.0 on a voluntary basis.

The legislation also requires cybersecurity staff for each branch of government in Kansas to work at the direction of the branch’s respective CISO. Additionally, beginning in 2028, a mechanism will be in place to certify an amount equal to 5.0 percent of an agency’s total budget that may be lapsed by the Senate Committee on Ways and Means or the House Committee on Appropriations should it be determined by the relevant Chief Information Technology Officer and Director of the Budget that an agency is not in compliance with provisions found within 2024 House Sub. for SB 291.

The provisions will expire on July 1, 2026, and the law will need to be reviewed sometime during the 2025 or 2026 Legislative Sessions.

For more information, contact:

James Fisher
Managing IT Analyst

Matthew Willis
Senior Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Passenger Rail in Kansas

Current Passenger Rail Service

Passenger rail service in Kansas is limited to Amtrak’s Southwest Chief from Chicago to Los Angeles, which includes nightly stops in Kansas City, Lawrence, Topeka, Newton, Hutchinson, Dodge City, and Garden City. Since 1999, the Heartland Flyer has connected Oklahoma City to Fort Worth, where Amtrak connections are available to Dallas and San Antonio. Passenger service from Newton to Oklahoma City has not been offered since 1979, but plans are underway for its restoration.

Legislative Review and Action

Extending passenger rail service in Kansas has been discussed for many years. The 2000 Task Force on Rail Passenger Services in Kansas found a Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka-Newton-Wichita route to be the most economically feasible of the passenger rail routes reviewed. Following public input in 2008 to the Special Committee on a New Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the Transportation Works for Kansas (T-Works) program (2010 Senate Sub. for Senate Sub. for HB 2650) was established. It added KSA 75-5089, which authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to establish and implement a passenger rail service program and authorizes the Secretary to, among other things, enter into agreements with Amtrak, other rail operators, local jurisdictions, and other states for that purpose.

The 2012 Special Committee on Transportation recommended the 2013 Legislature pursue private, local, state, and federal funding for maintenance of the Southwest Chief route and direct $3.0 million to an environmental study needed for federal funding for a Heartland Flyer Extension to link Newton and Oklahoma City. The study was not funded.
Advocates and stakeholders have continued to urge state support for passenger rail.

Representatives of Amtrak and the Midwest Interstate Passenger Rail Commission and advocates, including representatives of the Northern Flyer Alliance, Inc. (NFA), have periodically updated legislators. Representatives of Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT), 10 cities, 1 county, and 4 organizations, including NFA plus 11 individuals, provided proponent testimony on 2024 SB 349, which would have authorized a transfer of $5.0 million per year each July 1 in 2024 through 2034 from the State General Fund or KDOT special revenue funds for intercity passenger rail service. A proviso in 2024 SB 28, §142, authorizes FY 2025 loans or grants from the Passenger Rail Revolving Fund for intercity passenger rail service, with approval of the State Finance Council.

Federal Funding to Expand Service

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law) (P.L. 117-58) includes $102.0 billion in total rail funding, including $36.0 billion in authorized funding.

In late 2023, the Governor announced Kansas had received $500,000 in IIJA funding for a Service Development Plan (SDP) for the Heartland Flyer Extension, which means the project could qualify for future IIJA moneys for implementation. An SDP includes an analysis of operations, such as frequency, route timing, station location, and intermodal connections; capital investment needs, including for infrastructure, rolling stock, and stations; financial analysis involving ridership and revenue forecasts, potential funding mechanisms, and cost-sharing opportunities; and an implementation plan to identify roles, responsibilities, and costs.

Source: Passenger Rail Service Development Plan, KDOT.

KDOT, the project sponsor, has stated it is working with Amtrak, the Oklahoma and Texas departments of transportation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (BNSF) Passenger Operations, and BNSF Network Operations on the plan. Note: The Heartland Flyer Extension would use BNSF track, as does the Southwest Chief. Amtrak’s relationship with host railroads is governed by federal law (49 USC Subtitle V) and negotiated agreements specifying key terms such as schedules and performance standards.

The Federal Railroad Administration provided additional guidance on the SDP in August 2024 and expects to offer funding opportunities for future steps, including project development, final design, construction, and operation.

For more information, contact:

Jill Shelley
Principal Research Analyst

Eric Adell
Senior Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Hutchinson Correctional Facility Capital Improvement Projects

Background

The Hutchinson Correctional Facility (HCF) is the second-largest facility in Kansas housing male adults, with a capacity of 1,810 residents at four custody levels: maximum, special management, medium, and minimum.

The facility employs 507 full-time state employees, more than 85 contract employees, and has an annual operating budget of $47.3 million.

The majority of the structures composing HCF were built prior to 1912, which makes HCF the oldest correctional facility maintained by the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC). As an older facility, HCF no longer complies with safety requirements, such as minimum cell sizes and fire safety sprinkler systems, set by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the American Correctional Association.

In 2021, KDOC contracted with Carter Global Lee (CGL), a criminal justice consulting firm, to conduct an equipment and facility assessment of the site. CGL’s report concluded that it would be more cost effective to build a new facility than to renovate the existing facility.

The CGL report identified $80.2 million in capital needs over a 10-year period to address deficiencies in mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems; roofs; foundations; exterior enclosures; fire safety systems; and interior constructions. However, not included in this estimate is the cost to bring the facility up to ADA standards, to retrofit air conditioning into the housing units, and to increase cell sizes, as well as other possible issues not addressed due to the inspection being purely visual.

Courtesy of Kansas Department of Corrections

Plans

KDOC plans to construct a new facility incorporating modern correctional design and systems on adjacent land already owned by the agency.

Plans for the facility include:

  • 20,000 square feet of program space;
  • 105,000 square feet of private industry space;
  • Consolidating the medium- and maximum-security housing units for a total of 1,792 beds; and
  • A separate minimum security housing unit outside the secure perimeter with 400 beds.

The agency intends to seek an appropriation of approximately $453 million from the State General Fund for fiscal year 2026 to fund construction of the new facility.

A representative of KDOC presented the agency’s plan for the new facility to the J. Russell (Russ) Jennings Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight on November 19, 2024. The Committee recommended the Joint Committee on State Building Construction move forward with consideration on replacement of HCF.
KDOC plans to present the agency’s Five-year Capital Improvements Plan to the Joint Committee on State Building Construction at the Committee’s next meeting, scheduled for December 2024. During this presentation, the agency intends to discuss the deficiencies of the current HCF and its plans for a new facility.

For more information, contact:

Nicole Hrenchir
Fiscal Analyst

Natalie Nelson
Principal Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

Kansas Law Enforcement Fentanyl Response

Fentanyl-related controlled substances (fentanyl) are powerful synthetic, or lab-made, opioids. Fentanyl has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat severe pain related to surgery or complex conditions. However, over the past decade, fentanyl and other illegally made synthetic opioids have been increasingly found in the drug supply and have contributed to a dramatic rise in drug overdose deaths (via KDHE Drug Overdose Data Dashboard, https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/1309/Overdose-Data-Dashboard).

Fentanyl response can generally be broken down into three categories: prevention, treatment, and harm reduction. This article summarizes legislation passed by the Kansas Legislature since 2020 to address these areas.

Kansas Fights Addiction Act

The Kansas Fights Addiction Act was enacted in 2021(KSA 2023 Supp. 75-775 through 75-781). The Act established the Kansas Fights Addiction Fund and the Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund. These funds are the depositories for all moneys received by the State for opioid litigation in which the Attorney General is involved. This money is awarded as grants by the Kansas Fights Addiction Grant Review Board—also established by the Act—taking into account substance abuse prevention, reduction, treatment, or mitigation strategies. In calendar year 2023, $10.1 million was awarded from the first two funding opportunities, focusing on treatment and prevention. The fourth round of requests for proposals opened on August 5, 2024.

Prevention

Joint Fentanyl Impact Team

In 2023, the Legislature appropriated $2.9 million from the State General Fund (SGF) for the Kansas Bureau of Investigation’s (KBI) Surge Initiative for FY 2024. This initiative included funding for investigations of fentanyl drug trafficking operations. This initiative evolved into what the agency refers to now as the Fight Against Fentanyl, the special operations division within KBI dedicated specifically to the Joint Fentanyl Impact Team (JFIT). The JFIT is a collaboration between KBI, Kansas Highway Patrol, local law enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations, and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The objective of the JFIT is to identify and disrupt fentanyl trafficking and distribution networks.

In 2024, the Legislature added 5.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions to the KBI for the JFIT for FY 2024, supported with funding approved during the 2023 Legislative Session. For FY 2025, the Legislature appropriated $6.9 million SGF and added 30.0 FTE positions for KBI’s Fight Against Fentanyl effort. These positions include forensic scientists, analysts, special agents, and support staff.

Increased Penalties

2023 SB 174, among other things, increases penalties for crimes related to fentanyl. This includes increasing unlawful manufacturing of fentanyl to a drug severity level 1 felony from a drug severity level 2 felony. A special sentencing rule was established for the crime of manufacturing material containing any quantity of fentanyl; the rule includes presumptive imprisonment and two times the maximum duration of the presumptive sentence term. The sentence is not subject to appeal. Another special sentencing rule with the same penalty was added for the crime of manufacturing or distributing a controlled substance if the appearance or packaging was likely to be attractive to minors.

2024 SB 414, among other things, amends the penalties for unlawful distribution of a controlled substance to specify the penalty for the crime with respect to material containing any quantity of fentanyl to be the same as for material containing any quantity of heroin or methamphetamine. The bill also specifies penalties for instances where fentanyl is measured by a dosage unit. [Note: Dosage unit is a discrete unit including, but not limited to, a pill, capsule, microdot, or a liquid form not distributed by weight.] Additionally, the bill adds fentanyl to the list of drugs for which knowingly causing or permitting a child to be in an environment when the drug is present constitutes the crime of aggravated endangering a child.

Treatment

2023 Senate Sub. for HB 2010 expands eligibility for certain offenders for the non-prison sanction of placement in a certified drug abuse treatment program. Defendants convicted of a nonperson severity level 7, 8, 9, or 10 felony with a criminal history score of C through I are eligible to participate in a certified drug abuse treatment program, so long as the defendant has no prior convictions of manufacturing, cultivating, or distributing a controlled substance or unlawful acts involving proceeds from drug crimes. Defendants convicted of the same nonperson severity level felonies with a criminal history score of A or B and no prior convictions of manufacturing, cultivating, or distributing a controlled substance or unlawful acts involving process from drug crimes are eligible to participate in a certified drug abuse treatment program, provided the person felonies in the defendant’s history are nondrug severity level 8 or lower, and the court finds the safety of the public will not be jeopardized by placement of the defendant in such a program.

Harm Reduction

2023 SB 174, referenced above, also removes tests used to detect the presence of fentanyl from the definition of “drug paraphernalia” in the Kansas Criminal Code.

2024 House Sub. for SB 419 provides controlled substances “Good Samaritan” protections to those who, due to the use of a controlled substance, are seeking medical attention on their own behalf, seeking medical attention on behalf of another, or rendering medical aid to someone in need. Such a person must fully cooperate with law enforcement and emergency medical service (EMS) personnel while medical assistance is being provided, remain at the scene with the person needing medical assistance until EMS personnel and law enforcement officers arrive, and provide their full name and any other information necessary to provide medical assistance requested by law enforcement or EMS personnel. The bill provides eligible persons immunity from criminal prosecution for the crimes of possession of a controlled substance or possession with intent to use drug paraphernalia to introduce a controlled substance into the human body.

For more information, contact:

Jillian Block
Research Analyst

Iraida Orr
Principal Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181

SCOTUS 2023 Term Review and October 2024 Term Preview

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the ultimate appellate jurisdiction for all federal court cases, as well as state court cases that involve questions of Constitutional or federal law.

SCOTUS begins hearing cases in October of each year and typically issues decisions before the term is concluded, customarily in June or July of the following year.
This article provides a review of cases that were decided in the October 2023 term and a preview of cases that will be heard during the October 2024 term that involve issues recently before the Kansas Legislature.

Civil Asset Forfeiture

In Culley v. Marshall, the issue before SCOTUS was whether the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires a post-seizure hearing evaluating probable cause for the seizure prior to a forfeiture hearing. SCOTUS held that, in civil forfeiture cases involving personal property, the Due Process Clause requires a “timely” forfeiture hearing but does not require a separate preliminary probable cause hearing.

The 2024 Legislature enacted SB 458, amending several provisions of the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act. Among the revisions to the Act, SB 458 requires an affidavit describing probable cause supporting forfeiture to be filed in addition to the notice of pending forfeiture in order to commence forfeiture proceedings, and the forfeiture may proceed only after a judge has determined there is probable cause to believe the property is subject to forfeiture under the Act.

Homeless Encampments on Public Property

In City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson, the issue before SCOTUS was whether the city’s enforcement of public camping restrictions against homeless individuals violates the 8th Amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment. SCOTUS held that enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

2023 HB 2430 would have required local governments with ordinances prohibiting public camping, sleeping, or obstruction of public rights-of-way to enforce such ordinances. The bill would also have made the use of public lands for unauthorized sleeping, camping, or long-term shelters an unclassified nonperson misdemeanor.

2024 HB 2723 would have made appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for a grant program administered by the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services to fund homeless shelter infrastructure for local governments. Local governments that failed to enforce ordinances regarding camping and vagrancy would be required to pay back any grant funds awarded to them under the bill.

Neither bill advanced out of the House Committee on Welfare Reform during the 2023-2024 biennium.

Gender-affirming Care for Minors

In United States v. Skrmetti, the issue before SCOTUS is whether a Tennessee law that prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. As of September 2024, the parties have filed briefs in the case but no oral argument date has been set.

House Sub. for SB 233, passed by the 2024 Legislature and vetoed by the Governor, would have enacted the Forbidding Abusive Child Transitions Act. The bill would have prohibited health care providers from treating children whose gender identity is inconsistent with the child’s sex.

Age Verification for Certain Websites

In Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, the issue before SCOTUS is whether a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech, in order to protect minors’ access to sexual materials, should be reviewed under a rational-basis test or strict scrutiny test. In July 2024, SCOTUS granted a motion to extend the time for filing briefs in the case to September 16, 2024 (petitioner’s brief), and November 15, 2024 (respondent’s brief).

2024 SB 394 requires the use of age verification technology to permit access to internet websites containing material that is harmful to minors. The bill contains similar language to laws enacted in other states that have been subsequently challenged in federal court, including the Texas law at issue in Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton.

Regulation of E-cigarette Products

In Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, the issue before SCOTUS involves whether the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acted arbitrarily when it denied marketing authorization applications for new e-cigarette products. As of September 2024, the parties have filed briefs in the case but no oral argument date has been set.

2024 HB 2801 would have required manufacturers of e-cigarette products to certify that FDA approval has been obtained for each of its products offered for sale in Kansas and would have required establishment of a statewide database to list such approved products. The House Committee on Federal and State Affairs held a hearing on the bill, but no final action was taken before adjournment.

For more information, contact:

Natalie Nelson
Principal Research Analyst

Jordan Milholland
Managing Research Analyst

Kansas Legislative Research Department
Kansas State Capitol Building
300 W. 10th, Suite 68-West
Topeka KS 66612-1504
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov
(785) 296-3181